Remove topics nonobvious
article thumbnail

Only Humans are Inventive?

Patently-O

In its newest decision on the topic, the Federal Circuit declares instead, for the purposes of patent law, an inventor must be human. In my mind, it was always clear that the Federal Circuit would refuse Thaler’s petition, but it remains a fascinating topic in my mind. 35 U.S.C. ยง 100(f) (2022). ” Slip Op.

Invention 100
article thumbnail

Jury Instructions and Objective Indicia of Nonobviousness: Federal Circuit Grants New Trial in Inline Plastics v. Lacerta

Patently-O

In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit vacated a judgment of invalidity and remanded for a new trial, holding that the district court’s jury instruction on objective indicia of nonobviousness constituted prejudicial legal error. The case, Inline Plastics Corp. Lacerta Group, LLC , No. 2022-1954 (Fed. Inline Plastics Corp.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Making a Proper Determination of Obviousness

Patently-O

Against this background, the obviousness or nonobviousness of the subject matter is determined.โ€™ Emphasizing secondary considerations evidence: “Objective indicia may often be the most probative and cogent evidence of nonobviousness in the record.” John Deere Co.,

Art 122
article thumbnail

Fish Principals Author Law360 Article, โ€œUSPTO Director Review Is A Rare Remedy After Arthrexโ€œ

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

Hirshfeld agreed that the board’s analysis was “substantially similar” and “grant[ed] Director review for the Board to address Patent Owner’s objective evidence of nonobviousness” consistent with the Court’s guidance.[21]. Apple Inc. Personalized Media Communications LLC.

Patent 52