topics patent-prosecution-history 
Intellectual Property Law Blog
AUGUST 9, 2023
Topic This case addresses patent eligibility under Alice and whether the district court should have afforded the patent owner leave to amend its complaint. Background Sanderling asserted three patents sharing a common specification against Snap in the Northern District of Illinois. Sanderling opposed Snap’s motions.
SpicyIP
NOVEMBER 21, 2022
Given that drug regulation has a direct nexus to public health, maybe even more than patents, several years ago, Shamnad, Prashant and Sai started a new initiative on SpicyIP to throw more light on India’s drug regulatory framework. The book’s combination of history and contemporary issues makes for an immersive and compelling read.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently-O
OCTOBER 17, 2022
I’m always excited to read a decision that splits hairs–finding some claims in a patent valid and others invalid. The basic outcome here: Weisner’s claims directed toward collecting information are abstract ideas ; those directed toward using the information are patent eligible. Patent Nos. by Dennis Crouch.
Patently-O
JUNE 15, 2022
UMass’s claimed invention is a topical skin care product containing adenosine that is applied to the skin. UMass’s proposed construction now cannot fairly be squared with the under standing that both it and the examiner expressed during prosecution, and on which skilled artisans are entitled to rely. ” Id.
LexBlog IP
AUGUST 9, 2023
Topic This case addresses patent eligibility under Alice and whether the district court should have afforded the patent owner leave to amend its complaint. Background Sanderling asserted three patents sharing a common specification against Snap in the Northern District of Illinois. Sanderling opposed Snap’s motions.
The IPKat
DECEMBER 31, 2021
The EPO has launched a user consultation on grace periods for patents, the results of which will be published in early 2022 ( EPO press release ). The EPC as it currently stands does not permit a grace period in which inventors may disclose their invention without prejudicing a future patent filing. 102(b)(1)(A) ). 102(b)(1)(A) ).
Patently-O
APRIL 26, 2023
Though the patent system exists to promote innovation, it also serves to promote inventors and innovators. I still remember how happy I was when I filed my first patent back which was a moment of great joy and pride. And as time went by, I filed multiple patents and I felt more confident and more accomplished.”
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
130 
Let's personalize your content