Remove topics patent-reissue-applications
article thumbnail

PTAB Updates and Expands the Director Review Process and Offers Transparency in Ex parte Appeals

LexBlog IP

the Patent Office implemented an interim process for the Director to review Patent Trial and Appeal Board decisions in AIA trials. Until then, the Patent Office continues to offer new updates and information, most recently on July 24, 2023. After the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Arthrex, Inc. ,

article thumbnail

Human vs AI Analysis of USPTO Updates – How Does Bard Fare?

IP Tech Blog

To evaluate the capabilities of Generative AI, we selected the USPTO’s recent announcement about grants of digital patents as a topic, and compared a blog that we prepared and a blog that Generative AI (here, Google Bard) prepared. A sample of this new eGrant patent is available here. 35 U.S.C. § 35 U.S.C. §

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Human vs AI Analysis of USPTO Updates – How Does Bard Fare?

LexBlog IP

To evaluate the capabilities of Generative AI, we selected the USPTO’s recent announcement about grants of digital patents as a topic, and compared a blog that we prepared and a blog that Generative AI (here, Google Bard) prepared. A sample of this new eGrant patent is available here. ’’ 35 U.S.C. §

article thumbnail

2021 Post-Grant Report

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

10 YEARS AFTER THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT (AIA), THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD (PTAB) ENDURES. 1] Nevertheless, the PTAB remains the most active forum for patent disputes nationwide, handling significantly more matters in 2021 than both the Eastern and Western Districts of Texas and the District of Delaware. [2]. 1970 (2021).

article thumbnail

USPTO Appeals Panel to Clarify Antibody Claiming in MPF & Jepson Format

LexBlog IP

The USPTO is now committed to providing clarity on these topics in In re Xencor. On rehearing the applicant emphasized the difference between Jepson and MPF formatted claims and asserted that these differences were overlooked by the PTAB in its earlier decision. On appeal, the 112 rejection of the examiner was upheld.