Remove topics prior-art
article thumbnail

Making a Proper Determination of Obviousness

Patently-O

” In Graham , the court held Section 103 was intended to simply codify the common law of its prior cases – with the one exception of rejecting a “flash of creative genius test” to the extent one existed. John Deere Co., ” Quoting KSR. ” Quoting KSR.

Art 122
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Rules on Inventor-as-Lexicographer Definitions and the Proper Scope of Reply and Sur-Reply Briefing Following Patent Owner Responses to IPR Institution Decisions

Intellectual Property Law Blog

The Federal Circuit also engaged in a fact-specific obviousness inquiry regarding capacitor elements disclosed in the prior art. The patent owner response further argued that cited prior art Tayloe’s capacitors were not “storage elements” because they were not part of an energy transfer system. ParkerVision, Inc.,

Inventor 130
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

5 Key Takeaways - A Cost-Effective Patent Strategy for Startups

JD Supra Law

JD, recently provided a presentation at Daybreak Labs on the topic of “A Cost-Effective Patent Strategy for Startups.” Patent prior art landscapes and freedom-to-operate issues were also raised. Kilpatrick Townsend’s Yifan Mao, MSc, and Joseph Snyder, Ph.D.,

article thumbnail

Reliance on a silent technical effect: Application of G 2/21 to semiconductors (T 2465/19)

The IPKat

The problem solution approach to inventive step employed by the EPO relies on identification of the "closest prior art" with respect to the claimed invention. In such cases, the embodiment representing the "closest prior art" may be obscure and not known to the inventors at the filing date.

article thumbnail

[Webinar] Federal Circuit Appeals from the PTAB and ITC: Summaries of Key 2022 Decisions - February 2nd, 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm EST

JD Supra Law

Topics of the featured intellectual property cases include: exclusion of expert testimony, the ITC’s ability to enforce consent orders, estoppel by IPR final written decisions, standing to challenge PTAB decisions on appeal, obviousness in light of overlapping ranges in the prior art, and settlements of IPRs before.

article thumbnail

Can amending the description to summarize the prior art add matter to the patent application as filed? (T 0471/20)

The IPKat

The EPO Guidelines for Examination require the description of a patent application to summarise the background art ( F-II-4.3 ). This requirement usually manifests with a request from the Examiner for the description to be amended to identify the closest prior art. a burger patty production line).

Art 113
article thumbnail

First substantive decision of the UPC Court of Appeal overturns preliminary injunction in NanoString v 10x Genomics (UPC_CoA_335/2023)

The IPKat

The UPC CoA did agree with the Munich Local Division that the claim was novel in view of the prior art ( Göransson et al. ) , given that the prior art related to methods of analysing samples of extracted DNA that were clearly no longer recognisable as cells or tissues. The UPC CoA was not convinced by this argument.