Remove topics section-230
article thumbnail

Another Tough People Search Ruling–Spindler v. Seamless

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Section 230. In opposition, Plaintiff argues that Defendant’s “limitation would exclude most modern advertising, the vast majority of which is delivered by search engines like Google in response to user searches for topics of interest, just as Seamless delivered its advertisement in response to a search for Mr. Spindler.”

article thumbnail

New Article: “The United States’ Approach to ‘Platform’ Regulation”

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

230 (“Section 230”), and the limits on state regulation of the Internet. While I have written Section 230 explainers before ( this is my flagship ), this piece is broader because it surveys the First Amendment in addition to 230 and other topics. It highlights three key features of U.S.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Section 230 Preempts Game User’s Lawsuit Over Game Moderators’ Behavior–Quinteros v. Forge of Empires

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Section 230. Section 230(c)(1) provides immunity for claims based on third-party content. ’ Another 230(c)(2)(A) defense ruling on the heels of Daystar v. ’ Another 230(c)(2)(A) defense ruling on the heels of Daystar v. The court says Section 230 preempts most of those claims.

Contracts 112
article thumbnail

Section 230 Protects Services That Permit Anonymous Third-Party Posts–Bride v. Snap

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

” The defendants successfully defend on Section 230 grounds. Section 230 applied to all twelve of the plaintiffs’ claims. ” This is the latest entry in the confusing jurisprudence about when 230 applies to first-party marketing representations that are rendered untrue by users’ activities.

article thumbnail

Yearbook Defendants Lose Two More Section 230 Rulings

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

In particular, they are having some success bending Section 230, and this genre offers some interesting considerations for folks paying attention to the privacy/230 borders. Section 230. This is why the judge applied Section 230 in the Callahan case. Callahan v. PeopleConnect, Inc.,

article thumbnail

A Twitter Thread on the EARN IT Act

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

I did a (rare for me) Twitter thread on this topic, which is so crucial that I’m sharing it here as well: On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee will be marking up the EARN IT Act, which removes Section 230 for child sexual abuse material (CSAM).

article thumbnail

This Week in Washington IP: Improving Biomedical Research, Amending Section 230 to Hold Big Tech Accountable, and Promoting Privacy in the Tech Sector

IP Watchdog

This week in Washington IP news, the House of Representatives will host committee hearings discussing several draft pieces of legislation that would update the 21st Century Cures Act as well as reduce immunity to liability for major tech firms currently enjoyed under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

Privacy 59