Remove topics standing
article thumbnail

'We Cannot Go On Like This': CEO Vexes Samsung Trial Judge

IP Law 360

The CEO of a talent management company suing Samsung for trademark infringement spent a combative day on the witness stand Friday, frequently veering off-topic under cross-examination and giving long answers that were often stricken, prompting the California federal judge overseeing the trial to lament, "We cannot go on like this."

article thumbnail

Penile Implant Doc Combative With Rival's Atty At IP Trial

IP Law 360

A urologist suing his rival for allegedly stealing trade secrets on a cosmetic penile implant spent a combative day on the witness stand Thursday in the California federal trial, giving vague or noncommittal answers while receiving frequent admonishments from the judge for veering off topic or not answering a question.

IP 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Parliamentary Committee Report Outlines Policy Changes to Improve Indian IP Regime

IP Watchdog

Despite India’s progress in many areas, from science to literature to technology, protection for intellectual property rights (IPR) is a topic that has come under scrutiny. Recently, however, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Commerce (PSCC) decided to review IPRs in India. The Committee, led by Chairman Shri V.

Reporting 130
article thumbnail

Call for Papers: NLU Jodhpur’s Journal of Intellectual Property Studies Vol. VIII, Issue II [Submit by June 20, 2024]

SpicyIP

There are very few journals in India discussing at length topical issues in the field of intellectual property rights and hence, the journal’s objective is to fill this void by becoming a platform where ideas can be exchanged and in turn hopes to enhance discourse on intellectual property rights between policymakers, practitioners and scholars.

article thumbnail

Czech court finds that AI tool DALL-E cannot be the author of a copyright work

The IPKat

The claimant did not therefore have legal standing to bring the claim in question. However, the Court noted that the claimant failed to substantiate this allegation within any evidence (beyond their own witness evidence), and consequently failed to meet the burden of proof for showing authorship.

Copyright 145
article thumbnail

[Webinar] Federal Circuit Appeals from the PTAB and ITC: Summaries of Key 2022 Decisions - February 2nd, 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm EST

JD Supra Law

Topics of the featured intellectual property cases include: exclusion of expert testimony, the ITC’s ability to enforce consent orders, estoppel by IPR final written decisions, standing to challenge PTAB decisions on appeal, obviousness in light of overlapping ranges in the prior art, and settlements of IPRs before.

article thumbnail

Seeing Clearly: Article III Standing of IPR Judicial Review

Patently-O

Article III standing remains a hot topic at all levels of federal litigation and across many different areas of law. While standing was not necessary to file an IPR because of the administrative nature of the PTAB, standing is a constitutional requirement for appeal to the federal courts. 22-1706 (Fed.

Art 49