LexBlog IP

JULY 24, 2023

While technically and expansion of DR, this follows current practices in which the Director has addressed institution disputes sua sponte. On the ex parte side of the PTAB, a new Appeals Review Panel (ARP) is created that may be convened by the Director sua sponte, to review PTAB ex parte , reexamination, or reissue appeal decisions.

Designs 52

Designs Design Intellectual Property 52

LexBlog IP

NOVEMBER 3, 2023

The Board sua sponte struck RLP’s Notice of Reliance while also granting leave to file a proper amended notice. In its decision, the Board discussed the importance of properly categorizing and filing evidence, especially confidential and/or self-authenticating evidence.

Confidentiality 52

Confidentiality Registration Trademark Intellectual Property 52

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 15, 2023

The Appeal Review Panel (ARP) will review the Board’s ex parte appeal decisions (concerning ex parte prosecution, reexamination, and reissue) when the Director sua sponte deems review is needed—patent applicants may not request Director review.

Patent Application 52

Patent Application Patent Designs Design 52

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 24, 2022

The Kessler Doctrine : If you want to really dig into this case, please read my article on the topic that I wrote for an Akron Law review IP symposium issue. The invention in Yu was a multi-lens camera deemed abstract by the Federal Circuit. 2022)(forthcoming). The fourth and final case with a pending CVSG is Olaf Sööt Design, LLC v.

Patent Law 95

Patent Law Law Patent Litigation 95

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 26, 2022

Topics: Enablement / Written Description (All three are biotech / pharma): 3 Cases; Infringement (FDA Labeling): 1 Case; Anticipation (On Sale Bar): 1 Case; Double Patenting (Still the law?) But, the district court issued a sua sponte summary judgment — finding that the office was already diligently working.

Patent Law 125

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 125

Intellectual Property Law Blog

AUGUST 10, 2023

Topic This case addresses the proper standard for an appeal of a discretionary decision by a successor judge as well as requests for attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and certain circumstances that do not make a case exceptional.

IP 130

IP Litigation Patent Law 130

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 10, 2023

Topic This case addresses the proper standard for an appeal of a discretionary decision by a successor judge as well as requests for attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § § 285 and certain circumstances that do not make a case exceptional.

IP 52

IP Litigation Patent Law 52