Remove topics subject-matter-jurisdiction
article thumbnail

Announcing the SpicyIP Inaugural Doctoral Fellow!

SpicyIP

Considering that IP disputes often involve technical subject matters, different High Courts have accommodated provisions for appointing independent subject matter experts and also allow parties to file affidavits in evidence by their respective experts to assist the Court in understanding the nitty-gritty of the subject matter IP.

article thumbnail

Book Review: Research Handbook on IP and Moral Rights

The IPKat

The chapters are neatly divided into six parts, each focusing on different jurisdictions and perspectives of moral rights. The topics vary. By addressing the concepts of authorship and moral rights, as well as subject matter requirements, they evaluate AI and creative works to tackle the question of originality of AI-generated works.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

USPTO Requests Input on Patent Eligibility from Critical Sectors Impacted by Current Law

The IP Law Blog

The Supreme Court further recognized that “laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas” are not patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. As a result, the USPTO has requested comments from the public on 13 topics, which can be found at this link and are paraphrased and summarized below. intellectual property.

Law 109
article thumbnail

Examining the Specification

Patently-O

I would further divide written description into two categories: new matter and Ariad -style. Thus we get: New Matter Written Description : Any amendments made to the claims during prosecution must be supported by the originally filed specification. I would love to hear your thoughts on this topic.

Inventor 105
article thumbnail

A patent small claims court – what do you think?

Patently-O

Given ongoing interest in the topic, USPTO has engaged ACUS to conduct. topics, whether there is a need for a small claims patent court, the feasibility. topics, whether there is a need for a small claims patent court, the feasibility. Most recently, in December 2012, the USPTO. enforcement’’ (77 FR 74830 (Dec. 18, 2012)).

Patent 111
article thumbnail

Changes in the draft 2022 EPO Guidelines for Examination on description amendments: Substantial changes or window-dressing?

The IPKat

Applicants understandably are loath to make substantial amendments to the description, either by deleting subject matter or introducing statements to the effect that certain subject matter does not fall under the scope of the claim. After all, other jurisdictions don't find description amendments necessary.

article thumbnail

Patent Eligibility Jurisprudence

Patently-O

Last year, after a split panel decision concluding that a method for manufacturing drive shafts was patent ineligible, the Federal Circuit again issued a decision denying rehearing en banc that included multiple separate opinions with differing views on the scope of patent eligible subject matter. Topics for Public Comment.

Patent 102