Intellectual Property Law Blog

AUGUST 9, 2023

Topic This case addresses patent eligibility under Alice and whether the district court should have afforded the patent owner leave to amend its complaint. Snap moved to transfer venues and to dismiss asserting the patents were invalid for being directed to a patent-ineligible abstract idea under Alice. was correct. was correct.

Invention 130

Invention Patent 130

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 9, 2023

Topic This case addresses patent eligibility under Alice and whether the district court should have afforded the patent owner leave to amend its complaint. Snap moved to transfer venues and to dismiss asserting the patents were invalid for being directed to a patent-ineligible abstract idea under Alice. ”) was correct.

Invention 52

Invention Patent Intellectual Property 52

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 24, 2022

The Supreme Court has not yet granted writ of certiorari in any patent cases this term. And, absent an unusual shadow-docket patent case, it is now too late for any case to be granted and heard this term. Rather, any new grant this term will very likely be pushed back to the October 2022 Term for hearing and decision. Genentech, Inc. ,

Patent Law 95

Patent Law Law Patent Litigation 95

SpicyIP

AUGUST 15, 2021

Topical Highlight. They note that the grant of a compulsory license does not translate into the transfer of knowhow from the patentee to the license and therefore, the transfer of knowhow should be made part of the licensing arrangement between the patentee and the licensee. Thematic Highlight.

Licensing 83

Licensing Government Reporting Patent Law 83

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 26, 2022

Topics: Enablement / Written Description (All three are biotech / pharma): 3 Cases; Infringement (FDA Labeling): 1 Case; Anticipation (On Sale Bar): 1 Case; Double Patenting (Still the law?) by Dennis Crouch. It is time to pick-up our consideration of Supreme Court patent cases for the 2022-2023 term.

Patent Law 125

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 125

LexBlog IP

APRIL 3, 2023

This decision addresses many hot topics in licensing SEPs and attempts to harmonize existing decisions in reaching its rulings here.The Court here, for example, discussed the following topics: There is some dispute about whether a FRAND commitment imposes obligations on someone wanting to license an SEP.

Licensing 52

Licensing Technology Intellectual Property Patent 52