article thumbnail

UCB, Inc. v. Catalent Pharma Solutions, Inc.

JD Supra Law

RE38,551 (“the ’551 patent”) - Nature of the Case and Issue(s) Presented: The ’551 patent issued on July 6, 2004, and claimed “anticonvulsant enantiomeric amino acid derivatives,” including lacosamide. Catalent, a contract manufacturer, imported 479 kgs. UCB held the NDA for Vimpat. By: Robins Kaplan LLP

article thumbnail

EU Commission Encourages Use of New Anti-Piracy Toolbox

TorrentFreak

“For these purposes, the relevant information could consist of the same information which may be requested in accordance with Article 8(2) of Directive 2004/48/EC , including the email address, telephone number and IP addresses relating to alleged infringers or participants to alleged infringing activities.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

A present assignment of future continuation applications

Patently-O

The decision is lacking though because the court does not ground its decision in any particular contract or property tradition. Although it did not state directly, the court appears to have based its contract interpretation on federal patent law as it has done in prior cases. MLB Advanced Media, L.P., 3d 1284 (Fed.

article thumbnail

Quebec Court of Appeal Sears “Halloumi” Trademark (Again)

IPilogue

Cyprus entered into a contractual agreements with Saputo in 1999 and 2004, stipulating that Saputo “shall not use the trademark HALOMI on its products, or any other trademark confusingly similar with HALLOUMI or HALOMI.”

Trademark 106
article thumbnail

Announcing the 2021 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Over the years, I’ve posted a number of book excerpts that are accessible for free, including: The entire chapter on online contracts. It makes a nice module to add an online contracts piece to another course. Moody because the law is enjoined and the 11th Circuit opinion will supersede the district court opinion. Primer on CCPA/CPRA.

Editing 145
article thumbnail

Announcing the 2022 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Over the years, I’ve posted a number of book excerpts that are accessible for free, including: The entire chapter on online contracts. The chapter makes a nice module to add discussion about online contracts to another course. I posted the 2022 version, so it’s as fresh as it gets. Primer on CCPA/CPRA (partially deprecated).

Editing 138
article thumbnail

Bombay High Court Rules that Copyright Registration of a Label is not Compulsory

Kashishipr

SSPL was incorporated in 2004. When SSPL was incorporated in 2004, SK Oil Industries had assigned it the label’s copyright. The plaintiff, SSPL, had filed a lawsuit against the defendant NTC in the Bombay High Court, alleging Copyright and Trademark Infringement. Plaintiff’s Arguments. Bombay High Court’s Decision .