article thumbnail

Best of 2010: Forget breakfast — eBay eats Tiffany’s lunch

Likelihood of Confusion

The post Best of 2010: Forget breakfast — eBay eats Tiffany’s lunch appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™. The Second Circuit, unsurprisingly according to most commentators, has affirmed the decision of the Southern District of New York refusing to find eBay liable for contributory trademark infrintgement in the.

article thumbnail

3 Count: French Anti-Pirates

Plagiarism Today

The new agency has worked to tackle piracy by reducing the appearance of such resources in search engines and targeting advertising on such sites. Peters served as the Register of Copyrights from 1994 through 2010, a tenure that made her the second-longest running Register in history.

Licensing 170
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Harpic v. Domex:Product disparagement or nominative fair use?

IP and Legal Filings

Introduction Advertising is an important strategy for a company to sell its products to the customer. Advertising generated awareness about a particular product in among the masses and the reaction of the masses decides the fate of the product. To increase their sales, often companies indulge themselves in comparative advertising.

article thumbnail

US News rating was mere opinion except as to school that intentionally submitted bad information to it

43(B)log

From the 2009 rankings to the 2010 rankings, USC Rossier’s reported acceptance rate dropped 40 percentage points (from 50.7% USC allegedly orchestrated this scheme through its submission of false/incomplete data, and then advertised the resulting rankings knowing that they were misleading.

article thumbnail

Nickels and Dimes Goes Full Tilt on Noah’s Arcade in Trademark Infringement Suit

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

Nick els and Dimes states that it then began using the Trademark TILT STUDIO in 2010, and the TILTED 10 Trademark in 2021, in association with arcade games and indoor entertainment.

article thumbnail

The Supreme Court confirms that a third party may not use the ZARA trademark.

Garrigues Blog

The Supreme Court has confirmed that the use of another’s trademark to identify the prize in an advertising campaign constitutes an act of trademark infringement and ordered the infringer to pay compensation for damages. regarding the use of the ZARA trademark, as previously discussed here.

article thumbnail

2023 Internet Law Year-in-Review

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Regulators have sought to suppress online targeted advertising for years, with only minimal success. In turn, advertisers have fled Twitter. Then, in Liapes v. seriously, are you still posting THERE???) TikTok bans.

Law 102