article thumbnail

Public use == “accessible to the public.”

Patently-O

Minerva’s ‘208 patent claims a device for endometrial ablation and includes a 2011 priority filing date. The application was filed in 2011, but back in 2009 Minerva had been doing testing on a prototype “Aurora device” that included inner/outer frames made of two different types of steel. Microsoft Corp. ,

article thumbnail

The Inventive Entity and Prior Publication by Another

Patently-O

Under the AIA : Section 102 was substantially rewritten in the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011. Note – the case has a few other interesting and important procedural aspects that I’m not covering in this post. = = =. The revised provisions no longer consider the date-of-invention as relevant. a) Novelty; Prior Art.—A

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Battle of the spiritual and holistic therapists over ‘Archangel Alchemy’ trade mark

The IPKat

Since 2011, she had provided spiritual and holistic education, training and therapy services to the public in person and online.

article thumbnail

Post-IPR Estoppel: Printed Publication vs. Actual Product Shown in the Publication

Patently-O

As is usual these days, ELCO turned-around and filed an inter partes review petition — challenging the patent’s validity based upon a 2011 product catalog (printed publication) that had featured the Hatteras lighting product. DMF sued ELCO Lighting in 2018 for infringing DMF’s U.S. 9,964,266. ” 35 U.S.C.