article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Narrows “Comparison Prior Art” for Design Patent Infringement

JD Supra Law

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals recently narrowed the scope of “comparison prior art” that may be used in a design patent infringement analysis. Comparison prior art” includes references used to help highlight distinctions between a plaintiff’s claimed design and a defendant’s design that is accused of infringing.

article thumbnail

“Comparison Prior Art” Must Be Tied to the Same Article of Manufacture as That Claimed

Intellectual Property Law Blog

15, 2023) , the Federal Circuit vacated a jury verdict of non-infringement in a design-patent infringement action filed by Columbia Sportswear against Seirus Innovative Accessories. Design Patent No. Issues Whether the district court erred in its jury instructions on the comparison prior art and the Seirus logo.

Art 162
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Patent Poetry: Federal Circuit Rules on “Comparison Prior Art” in Design Patent Infringement

JD Supra Law

The Federal Circuit has ruled that “comparison prior art” used in infringement analysis in a design patent infringement must be applied to the same “article of manufacture” that is identified in the claim of the design patent. By: AEON Law

article thumbnail

Chilly Adventures: Design Patent Prior Art Comparison Applies to Article of Manufacture

JD Supra Law

Addressing a matter of first impression concerning the scope of prior art relevant to a design patent infringement analysis, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded that “to qualify as comparison prior art, the prior-art design must be applied to the article of manufacture identified in the claim.”

article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Narrows Scope of Prior Art Available for Design Patents

JD Supra Law

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s recent decision on an appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to limit prior art for design patent applications to only analogous fields may make it easier for applicants to obtain design patents and more difficult for challengers to invalidate them.

article thumbnail

2023 Design Patents Year in Review: Analysis & Trends

JD Supra Law

did we see court decisions that will, in the case of one, and could in the case of another, have significant impact on design patent jurisprudence. In one, the court addressed an issue of first impression – whether comparison prior art in an infringement analyses must involve the. However, nowhere more than the U.S.

article thumbnail

Design Patent: Invalid as Unduly Functional

Patently-O

Evo’s design patent claims an “ ornamental design for a foldable bag ” as shown in the figures above. district court held the patent invalid as both functional and obvious; and also not infringed. Functionality : Design patents focus on ornamentality rather than utility. by Dennis Crouch.