SpicyIP

DECEMBER 6, 2023

In St Art India Foundation v. Acko General Insurance , the Delhi High Court is faced with the opportunity to elaborate whether and how street art in general is subject to the Copyright Act, the scope of ‘artistic work’ under Sec. 2(c), the fair use exemption thereof under Sec. Image from the order.

Moral Rights 49

Moral Rights Fair Use Art Artistic Work 49

JD Supra Law

MAY 22, 2023

The Supreme Court ruled on May 18 that Andy Warhol’s “Orange Prince” work of pop art was not a fair use when licensed to Condé Nast in 2016. Dawn Jackson is a co-author of this post and is a Summer Associate at Bradley. By: Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Fair Use 55

Fair Use Art Licensing 55

LexBlog IP

MAY 22, 2023

The Supreme Court ruled on May 18 that Andy Warhol’s “Orange Prince” work of pop art was not a fair use when licensed to Condé Nast in 2016. Apparently, Warhol had created an entire series of 15 other works of pop art using Goldsmith’s initial photograph. § 107 ).

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Derivative Work Copyright Infringement 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

JUNE 5, 2023

“Warhol Print” (Vanity Fair), Page 8, Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. 2021) (available here ); “Warhol Print” also available here “Goldsmith Photograph”, Page 7, Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Goldsmith, 11 F.4th 4th 26 (2d Cir. Goldsmith, 11 F.4th 4th 26 (2d Cir. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.

Derivative Work 117

Derivative Work Fair Use Licensing Art 117

Copyright Lately

MAY 22, 2023

Five things to know about the Supreme Court’s new purpose-driven fair use opinion in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (“ Warhol “) is that relatively rare fair use case in which both the original and follow-on works were more or less directly competing in the same market. Andy Warhol Foundation v.

Fair Use 92

Fair Use Licensing Copying Artwork 92

IP Law 360

AUGUST 24, 2022

The Ultimate Fighting Championship's new lawsuit over a documentary on mixed martial arts fighter Michael Bisping is the latest court case to grapple with the question of when filmmakers in the genre can incorporate copyrighted material in the name of fair use.

Fair Use 98

Fair Use Art Copyright 98

JD Supra Law

MAY 22, 2023

Supreme Court issued a long-awaited ruling clarifying one element of the Copyright Act’s fair use doctrine. The Court held that because both Warhol’s art and the Petitioner’s photograph were used with magazine articles about Prince, the purpose and character of both works were the same. On May 18, 2023, the U.S.

Fair Use 98

Fair Use Copyright Art 98

JD Supra Law

APRIL 2, 2024

The US Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit overturned a federal district court's determination that Netflix made fair use of the plaintiff's video in the 2020 Netflix show “Tiger King,” citing last year’s US Supreme Court decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. By: ArentFox Schiff

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art 52

IP Watchdog

DECEMBER 12, 2021

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit holding that Andy Warhol’s Prince Series did not constitute fair use of Lynn Goldsmith’s photograph. The Second Circuit held in March that “the district court erred in its assessment and application of the fair-use factors and the works in question do not qualify as fair use.”

Fair Use 124

Fair Use Copyright Law Law Copyright 124

JD Supra Law

APRIL 13, 2022

Hyperbolic descriptions of the supposed importance of cases dealing with intellectual property rights are as numerous as they are unfounded, but that is not true when it comes to The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Goldsmith, Case No. 21-869, in which the U.S. Supreme Court just granted certiorari.

Fair Use 98

Fair Use Intellectual Property Copyright Art 98

IP Law 360

MAY 19, 2023

Goldsmith narrows the scope of what qualifies as fair use, seemingly backtracking on nearly two decades of precedent, it does not close the door to appropriation art altogether, say Joshua Schiller and Benjamin Margulis at Boies Schiller. While the recent U.S. Supreme Court opinion in Andy Warhol Foundation v.

Fair Use 75

Fair Use Copyright Art 75

JD Supra Law

MAY 30, 2023

Last week, the Supreme Court decided an important copyright case on the question of fair use in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Goldsmith, 2023 WL 3511534. By: Clark Hill PLC

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Copyright 52

IP Watchdog

MARCH 28, 2022

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit holding that Andy Warhol’s Prince Series did not constitute fair use of Lynn Goldsmith’s photograph.

Fair Use 105

Fair Use Art Litigation Copyright 105

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

FEBRUARY 12, 2024

In a courtroom showdown that has captivated both the art and legal worlds, celebrity tattoo artist Kat Von D emerged victorious in a copyright lawsuit brought against her by photographer Jeffrey Sedlik. For Von D, the decision marked the end of a two-year legal ordeal.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Social Media Art Copyright 52

JD Supra Law

JULY 21, 2022

The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit analyzed the fair use doctrine of US copyright law in a dispute for recognition of a 2001 French judgment relating to a finding of copyright infringement of certain photographic works featuring the art of Pablo Picasso.

Fair Use 55

Fair Use Art Copyright Infringement Copyright Law 55

LexBlog IP

MAY 24, 2023

Warhol’s use of Prince’s photo (taken by Lynn Goldsmith) was not entitled to fair use. The Court found that Goldsmith’s earlier photo and Andy Warhol’s use served the same commercial purpose – as a magazine illustration. I am not so sure. Take a look a the illustration above.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Artwork Intellectual Property Copyright Law 52

IP Law 360

AUGUST 12, 2022

Supreme Court should establish a clear standard for fair use in a copyright battle over Andy Warhol artwork based on a photo of musician Prince, arguing it's a chance for the court to spell out what counts as a transformative work. The head of the American Bar Association's copyright division said Friday that the U.S.

Fair Use 75

Fair Use Artwork Art IP 75

Kluwer Copyright Blog

MAY 9, 2022

“Warhol Print” (Vanity Fair), Page 8, Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. “Goldsmith Photograph”, Page 7, Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Starkly deviating from this trend was a Second Circuit panel decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.

Fair Use 128

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 128

JD Supra Law

JUNE 6, 2023

Supreme Court found that the purpose and character of the use of “Orange Prince” by the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts (AWF) weighed against a finding of fair use of Lynn Goldsmith’s photograph of the artist known as Prince. On May 18, 2023, the U.S. By: Pillsbury - Internet & Social Media Law Blog

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Social Media Blogging 52

IP Watchdog

OCTOBER 12, 2022

Lynn Goldsmith, a case asking the nation’s highest court to determine whether Warhol’s unlicensed use of Goldsmith’s photographs of pop superstar Prince was a fair use of that copyright-protected photo.

Fair Use 116

Fair Use Derivative Work Copyright Art 116

JD Supra Law

MAY 19, 2023

On May 18, 2023, the US Supreme Court, in a much-anticipated decision, held that portraits of the musician Prince by Andy Warhol do not constitute fair use under copyright law. The 7 – 2 decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc.

Fair Use 55

Fair Use Copyright Infringement Copyright Law Art 55

IP Tech Blog

JUNE 2, 2023

The Supreme Court recently upheld an appellate court’s ruling that Andy Warhol’s use of a photograph of Prince as a reference for a collection of screen prints is not fair use – to the extent his foundation decided to license them at least. Goldsmith et al, Case No. Goldsmith et al, Case No. Unbeknownst to Ms.

Fair Use 57

Fair Use Derivative Work Copying Licensing 57

The Illusion of More

JUNE 1, 2023

Although the most straightforward cases of fair use thus involve a secondary work that comments on the original in some fashion, in Cariou v. Prince, we rejected the proposition that a secondary work must comment on the original in order to qualify as fair use. –

Art 107

Art Fair Use Copyright 107

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 28, 2022

1] That decision shook the art world, as it seems to dramatically narrow the scope of the fair use doctrine, and raises doubts about the lawfulness of many existing works. [2] It found that all four fair use factors weighed against fair use. [12] Originals” [7] : The Works at Issue.

Fair Use 97

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 97

LexBlog IP

JULY 7, 2023

A pair of copyright decisions issued in May, one involving the appropriation artist Richard Prince [1] and the other involving works portraying the musician known as Prince, explore and expand on the “fair use” defense to copyright infringement. On May 11, the U.S. 2] A week later, the U.S. 3] Graham v.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Licensing Copyright Infringement 52

Art Law Journal

OCTOBER 24, 2018

Fair use is a common art law issue that arises for artists. Here, we review the College Art Association's Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for the Visual Arts. Nicole Martinez.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Art Law Law 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 19, 2023

Clarifying Copyright Fair Use in Commercialized and Licensed Visual Arts: Insights from Warhol v. Goldsmith by Jaime Chandra Clarifying Fair Use in Commercialized & Licensed Visual Arts: Insights from the Warhol v. We’re talking about Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Licensing Derivative Work 52

JD Supra Law

MAY 22, 2023

Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in favor of the respondent copyright holder in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Lynn Goldsmith et al., By: Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Copyright Art Licensing 52

JD Supra Law

JUNE 8, 2023

The Supreme Court’s recent and much-anticipated decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Goldsmith redefines the contours of the fair use defense to copyright infringement.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Copyright Infringement Licensing 52

Above the Fold

MAY 22, 2023

This high-profile case hinged on whether Warhol’s images of Prince meaningfully transformed Goldsmith’s original black and white photo so as to create a new work of art protected by the fair use doctrine. SCOTUS held that Warhol’s images did not constitute fair use.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Copyright Infringement Art Music 52

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 4, 2023

A Few Words for a Lost Friend: Tribute to Dmitry Karshtedt (Bob Brauneis, Mark Lemley, Jake Sherkow) Closing Plenary Session: Fair use Robert Brauneis, Copyright Transactions in the Shadow of Fair Use Suppose a work does not infringe another work because and only because it’s been ruled a fair use.

Fair Use 59

Fair Use Derivative Work Copying Marketing 59

LexBlog IP

MAY 22, 2023

This high-profile case hinged on whether Warhol’s images of Prince meaningfully transformed Goldsmith’s original black and white photo so as to create a new work of art protected by the fair use doctrine. SCOTUS held that Warhol’s images did not constitute fair use.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Copyright Infringement Music 52

Plagiarism Today

AUGUST 21, 2023

Court tosses USCO case over AI art, court to revisit fair use tattoo case and Lord of the Rings fan fiction author loses vs Amazon. The post 3 Count: Non-Copyrighted AI appeared first on Plagiarism Today.

Copyright 221

Copyright Fair Use Plagiarism Art 221

JD Supra Law

JUNE 13, 2023

Supreme Court issued its first decision this century on copyright fair use in the artistic context. for the Visual Arts, Inc. On May 18, 2023, the U.S. Andy Warhol Found. Goldsmith, 143 S. 1258 (2023).

Fair Use 55

Fair Use Copyright Infringement Copyright Art 55

Intellectual Property Brief

FEBRUARY 1, 2022

The Louvre and The Uffizi Gallery fight for the fair use of their classic works following Pornhub’s exploitative approach to educate its patrons about classic art. Pornhub’s argument against infringement claims reveals the museums’ strict partiality in their regulation of fair use.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Blogging 52

JD Supra Law

MAY 22, 2023

For the first time in almost 20 years, the United States Supreme Court has issued a ruling that has prompted vigorous debate over the future of the fair use doctrine under the Copyright Act. On May 18, 2023, in Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc. By: Miller Canfield

Fair Use 55

Fair Use Art Copyright 55

IP Law 360

JANUARY 18, 2024

Developers of generative artificial intelligence models are using vast datasets compiled by nonprofits to train large language models and text-to-art platforms, raising the question of whether AI companies can shield themselves from copyright liability because they did not compile or pay for the material.

Fair Use 85

Fair Use Art Copyright 85