article thumbnail

[Part I] Cryogas Judgment: Supreme Court Stops Copyright from ‘Gaslighting’ Design

SpicyIP

Inox India Limited and Others , Aditya Bhargava discusses the jurisprudence on the difference between copyright and industrial designs and the two-pronged test to distinguish between the two intellectual properties adopted by the Court in this case. Inox India Ltd.

Designs 59
article thumbnail

[Part II] Cryogas Judgment: Supreme Court Stops Copyright from ‘Gaslighting’ Design

SpicyIP

Part II] Cryogas Judgment: Supreme Court Stops Copyright from Gaslighting Design By Aditya Bhargava In the first part of the post, I looked at how jurisprudence has evolved from the Microfibres case in 2006 up to the present case in Cryogas. This became known as the functional vs. aesthetic dichotomy in design cases.

Designs 59
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Demarcating the Boundaries: The Supreme Court’s Twin Test for Resolving Copyright and Design Conflicts Under Section 15(2)

Intepat

Introduction The intersection between copyright and design law has long been a contentious and evolving area within Indian intellectual property jurisprudence. Yet, over time, confusion has persisted regarding what qualifies as a “design” and when copyright ceases. & Anr. This new ruling addresses that.

Designs 52
article thumbnail

[Guest post] Can the owner of an artistic work convert it into an NFT for its use in the Metaverse?

The IPKat

Now, a further development on IP and NFTs comes from Spain, as Katfriend Mercedes Morán Ruiz (CEDRO) reports: Can the owner of an artistic work convert it into an NFT for its use in the Metaverse? We will have to wait until the final judgment is issued. 5/08, paragraph 56; C?435/12,

article thumbnail

WaterRower: Has the UK’s approach to ‘artistic works’ in copyright changed?

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Even though it’s only an interim decision, it is interesting and well worth a read for any copyright lawyer because Deputy High Court Judge David Stone provides an in-depth analysis of the UK copyright position on artistic works. A work of artistic craftsmanship is a sub-category of an artistic work.

article thumbnail

Assessing the Cryogas Judgment from the lens of Section 52(1)(w)

SpicyIP

Inox India Limited and Others , is the latest addition to the jurisprudence on the interplay between copyright and designs. The Court agreed, stating that the flanges were functional parts , not artistic works, and using the technical drawings to make such components did not constitute copyright infringement.

article thumbnail

Copyrightability Of Designer Clothes And Costumes

IP and Legal Filings

Introduction An artist’s ideas, be it for a renowned painting, sculpture, novel, technological design, jewelryor fashion are his own. They must not be used by anyone other than the artist himself. However, many a times, we witness these designs being copied or recreated. What Is Copyright?

Designs 105