article thumbnail

[Book Review] 25 things you should know about artificial intelligence, art and copyright

The IPKat

For instance, he reviews the UK system of protection for computer-generated works and the EU sui generis database right. Drawing a parallel with the lack of real impact of the database right, Fernández suggests policymakers should avoid creating a special right for AI-generated works.

Art 52
article thumbnail

Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat the past 2 weeks!

The IPKat

PermaKat Neil Wilkof commented on the reproduction of the work of art " Detail from the Portrait of Eugénie-Pamela Larivière" (which is in the public domain) by Louis Larivière in the Louvre, Paris" on a book cover.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Digital collections from GLAM institutions: Policy Paper

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Minimize database rights to favour access to and use of digital works. National policymakers should review existing sui generis database rights or similar rights, when they exist, in order to avoid limiting access and use of public domain works. Proposal 4.

article thumbnail

The Jungle Bird, El Diablo, and the Zombie or Machine Learning Models, Computer Programs and Copyright put to the test

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Accordingly, the most valuable part of the model – the functionality of such an arrangement – would not be protected and would remain in the public domain. Thus, most cases would remain in the public domain under impossible authorship claim articulation. These topics are in need of further research.

article thumbnail

Book Review: Overlapping Intellectual Property Rights (Second Edition)

The IPKat

The authors look at the issue from the perspective of US and EU approaches to database protection. Their analysis is especially relevant in light of the criticism of the EU sui generis database rights and recent plans to revisit the EU Database Directive.