Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

MAY 27, 2021

The Fish attorneys recognized and their respective programs include: Timothy Riffe – California Inventors Assistance Program. Yao Wang – California Inventors Assistance Program. Craig Deutsch – LegalCORPS’ Inventor Assistance Program. Grace Kim – LegalCORPS’ Inventor Assistance Program. Jacqueline Tio – Georgia PATENTS.

Due Diligence 52

Due Diligence Inventor Patent Patent Prosecution 52

Patently-O

AUGUST 26, 2022

2:21-cv-00126-JRG-RSP) (not available on line for free from what I can see) addressed an accused infringer’s argument that the assignment of the patent-in-suit from the sole inventor (Afana) to the plaintiff, Mobile Equity, was ineffective, and so the patentee lacked standing. Walmart (Case No. Taylor Made Plastics, Inc.,

Ownership 56

Ownership Inventor Patent Due Diligence 56

Kashishipr

MAY 5, 2021

Point of View 1: Patent Trolls do not Hurt Innovation. According to this viewpoint, patent trolls give way for further innovation. Patent trolls often conduct through IP Due Diligence to acquire high-quality patents capable of exponential monetization. Point of View 2: Patent Trolls do Hurt Innovation.

Patent Troll 98

Patent Troll Patent Inventor Intellectual Property 98

Garrigues Blog

JUNE 22, 2021

This is why it is important to be able to justify the registration of the patent in another territory, if it is not initially registered in Spain. However, following the entry into force of Patents Law 24/2015 (PL), we need to reassess whether this is always the best strategy. Many scenarios may arise.

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Patent Application Due Diligence 52

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

SEPTEMBER 16, 2022

The Notice extends these duties broadly to “each individual associated with the filing and prosecution of a patent application” and “each individual associated with the patent owner in a reexamination proceeding.” What This Means for Life Sciences Patent Applicants.

Patent Prosecution 76

Patent Prosecution Due Diligence Reporting Inventor 76

Intepat

FEBRUARY 13, 2021

Prior art generally comes in the form of evidence, proving that your invention was already publicly available before the date on which you filed a patent application. It is always recommended to conduct a prior art search to avoid submitting patent applications with unpatentable claims and will be quickly rejected.

Art 52

Art Invention Due Diligence Patent Application 52

Dragons' Den

MARCH 16, 2023

The Dragons were particularly interested in this fact, because not having a patent means that others could, in theory, copy Alan’s invention. When considering a patent application, patent examiners must establish whether an invention is new – so, it must not be publicly available elsewhere in the world and must be inventive.

Due Diligence 52

Due Diligence Invention Journalism Branding 52