Is this use of Swift-associated phrases transformative? And really, can you blame them?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2024
(75)
-
▼
February
(28)
- Falsely advertising "ghost guns" as legal in NY is...
- US News rating was mere opinion except as to schoo...
- TMSR Session 3: Private Actors…and their Machines
- TMSR Session 2: Administrative Agencies and Specia...
- 15th Trademark Scholars’ Roundtable: Session 1: Co...
- ex-employee's Glassdoor post wasn't commercial adv...
- Switching tomato varieties but keeping nearly exac...
- Descriptive mark Bike+ w/minimal marketing fails t...
- CFP: trademark, competition, or antitrust law
- New piece: A Hobgoblin Comes for Internet Regulation
- Cardozo A&ELJ symposium, Trademark
- Cardozo A&ELJ symposium: Amy Adler Keynote and War...
- False patent marking claims survive even when Dast...
- Damages questions preclude certifying a Lanham Act...
- misrepresentation to Amazon isn't "commercial adve...
- FTC's new rule against impersonation includes noti...
- challenge to Sirius XM's (huge) junk fees survives
- "recyclable" plausibly misleading where no recycli...
- Right of publicity question of the day, Taylor Swi...
- Transformative work of the day, Omelas edition
- WIPIP session 7: Design Law
- WIPIP session 6: IP Theory
- WIPIP session 5: Anti-Circumvention
- WIPIP session 4: ™ & Consumers
- WIPIP session 3: Cultural Production
- WIPIP session 2: ™ Doctrine, © Fair Use
- WIPIP Session 1: AI
- reliance can be presumed in NY from material misle...
-
▼
February
(28)
Labels
- 1201 (18)
- 1202 (1)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (281)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (534)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (46)
- class actions (276)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (266)
- conferences (910)
- consumer protection (920)
- content moderation (2)
- contracts (99)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1635)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (156)
- dastar (189)
- defamation (200)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (56)
- dilution (256)
- disclosures (94)
- disparagement (28)
- dmca (201)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3023)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (4)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (271)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (435)
- ftc (182)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (111)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (222)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preemption (263)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (144)
- property (18)
- reading list (306)
- remedies (269)
- right of publicity (260)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (352)
- surveys (100)
- teaching (37)
- tortious interference (112)
- trade secrets (80)
- trademark (2015)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (61)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment