LoTempio Law Blog
DECEMBER 3, 2020
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post. The post Protected: Interview with Kae and Cami Creator, Debbie Sullivan appeared first on Vincent LoTempio | Registered Patent Attorney, Trademark, and Copyright | 1-800-866-0039.
Greenspoon Marder LLP
DECEMBER 3, 2020
Featuring: Justin McNaughton, Partner and Sharon Urias, Partner Join us to discuss the Grinch who tried to misappropriate, and therefore assert the right to exclusive use over holiday symbols, slogans, decorations, and cheer. Humbug. Click here to watch the recording. The post You, Me & IP Webinar Series: The Grinch Who Stole Holiday Trademarks appeared first on Greenspoon Marder LLP.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LoTempio Law Blog
DECEMBER 3, 2020
For today’s blog post, we had the opportunity to speak with Kae & Cami creator, Debbie Sullivan. Kae & Cami is, as Debbie describes it on her site, a “patented magnetic jewelry and scarf accessory line that helps fit and style your scarf masks, tops, scarves, pashminas, head wraps, cover-ups, dresses and more.” Recently, the […].
Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts
DECEMBER 3, 2020
Fish Principal Patrick Finn was recently featured by Minnesota Lawyer. The broad-ranging interview begins with Patrick noting that so much time and effort goes into obtaining patents that “you kind of see all of them as your children.”. Read the full article: “Breaking the Ice: IP ‘family’ grows with virus-related patent” | Minnesota Lawyer.
Speaker: Blackberry, OSS Consultants, & Revenera
Software is complex, which makes threats to the software supply chain more real every day. 64% of organizations have been impacted by a software supply chain attack and 60% of data breaches are due to unpatched software vulnerabilities. In the U.S. alone, cyber losses totaled $10.3 billion in 2022. All of these stats beg the question, “Do you know what’s in your software?
Bio Law Blog
DECEMBER 3, 2020
Over the past decade, the “printed matter doctrine” has rarely been invoked in life sciences cases, but recently on Nov. 10, the Federal Circuit issued a decision in C R Bard Inc. et al. v. Angiodynamics, Inc. , No. 2019-1756, 2019-1934, 2020 WL 6573331 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 10, 2020), where it reviewed the applicability of the printed matter doctrine in the context of patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. §101 and anticipation under 35 U.S.C. §102.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content