Event announcement - The DSM Directive 3 years on: The Polish challenge to Article 17 and the national transposition maze
Three years after its adoption, the discussion of and around the Directive on copyright and related rights in the Digital SingleMarket 2019/790 (‘DSM Directive’) is anything but exhausted.
The fate of one its key provisions – Article 17 – is still unknown due to the pending judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) in Poland v Council and Parliament, C-401/19. A significant number of EU Member States is yet to complete the national transposition process, despite the deadline of 7 June 2021. In all this, existing national transpositions already show significant divergences in the Member States’ approaches to the implementation of the Directive.
The Institute for Intellectual Property and Market Law (IFIM) at Stockholm University, which I have the honour of currently directing, is proud and delighted to announce its new, in-person event, which will be held in English at Stockholm University on Thursday, 2 June 2022 on the topic of: ‘The DSM Directive 3 years on: The Polish challenge to Article 17 and the national transposition maze’.
IFIM is thrilled to announce that the keynote address will be delivered by Henrik Saugmandsgaard Øe, appointed Advocate General in C-401/19 and author of an impactful Opinion in that case.
Programme
15:00 – 15:05: Welcome
15:05 – 15:50: Keynote Address – The Polish Challenge to Article 17 (C-401/19)
Henrik Saugmandsgaard Øe
15:50 – 16:00: Q&As
16:00 – 16:45: Panel Discussion – The Transposition Discourse: What Should Member States Do?
Anna Bladh Redzic
Hans Eriksson
Miranda Espenäs
Eleonora Rosati (Chair)
16:45 – 17:00: Q&As and Closing Remarks
17:00 – 18:00: Drinks and Canapés
Speakers (in alphabetical order)
- Anna Bladh Redzic, Partner at Sandart & Partners
- Hans Eriksson, Partner at Westerberg
- Miranda Espenäs, Senior Associate at Wistrand
- Eleonora Rosati, Professor of Intellectual Property Law at Stockholm University and IFIM Director
- Henrik Saugmandsgaard Øe, former Advocate General at the Court of Justice of the European Union and Partner at Gorrissen Federspiel
Further information and registration
For further information and to register, please click here.
We look forward to seeing you in Stockholm in early June!
PS: There is no better time of the year to discover and explore this beautiful city!
Event announcement - The DSM Directive 3 years on: The Polish challenge to Article 17 and the national transposition maze
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Wednesday, April 13, 2022
Rating:
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Wednesday, April 13, 2022
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn ![[Guest post] Can AI be considered a PHOSITA? Policy debates in the US and the EU](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggxDO6mW5r4n3-06Af5ckmIaMIhzgPJBoDP8AUsSYXY2zajUQt1ObGVn_GhCgidbG_YDVnybQuJ5XoAjjBG9Ws2xJWDQHNPMrLkn526SWIG371X_Kjt1E8tJmn8Ae_20Phyphenhyphen09JeuUOhhTR3aZE9lMRQlqHGQGcAWGxlo91rrKcLk0AfUjWCvw6RQ/s72-c/Two-cats-eating.jpg)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html