article thumbnail

Intersection of Intellectual Property Law and Competition Law with respect to Cross Licensing Agreements

IIPRD

This has led to the introduction of intellectual property rights which are a set of exclusionary rights as it excludes the world from enjoying a set of rights arising out an invention or creation, except the inventor or creator. Competition Commission of India and Ors.

article thumbnail

Intellectual Property Law and Competition Law: Conflicting or Complementing

IIPRD

Introduction If we take a broader look at the Intellectual Property Laws, the primary objective of the legislation in framing these laws is to provide exclusive rights to the IP right holder as against the entire world. Therefore, the two legislations clearly have contrasting objectives.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Whose Serve is it Anyway? Assessing the Sun Pharma v. Dabur Finding on the Applicants’ Obligation to Serve Counter-Statements

SpicyIP

Anurathna and Nivrati are intellectual property law attorneys practicing at ALG India Law Offices LLP, Delhi. Anurathna is a graduate from Tamil Nadu National Law University, and Nivrati is a graduate from Institute of Law, Nirma University.

Copying 110
article thumbnail

High Stakes: Protecting Your Cannabis Intellectual Property

Canadian Intellectual Property Blog

While medical cannabis has traditionally been a source of intellectual property (IP), legalization is sure to bring an influx of applications in the coming years. Canada (Commissioner of Patents), 2002 SCC 76. [3] This article does not create a solicitor-client relationship between you and MBM Intellectual Property Law LLP.

article thumbnail

Australia’s Reversal of its DABUS decision on AI-Generated Inventions: How Does this Impact an Imminent Canadian Discussion on AI Inventorship?

IPilogue

Michelle Mao is an IPilogue Writer and a 2L JD candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School. Reversing what seemed like a victory for supporters of AI-owned intellectual property, the full bench of the Federal Court of Australia has confirmed the majority view of the world: only human inventors can own patent rights to their creations.

Invention 111
article thumbnail

Advent of AI Voice Generation and Threat to Personality Rights

IP and Legal Filings

The development of Artificial Intelligence, from being able to create edited photos to now generating deepfake videos that cannot be distinguished from real videos, has created an imminent threat to intellectual property rights and personality rights specifically. 893 of 2002 (Del) (India). [2] 2] CS (COMM) 819 of 2022. [3]

article thumbnail

A Message from IP Osgoode’s New Director, Prof. Carys Craig

IPilogue

Carys Craig is the Director of IP Osgoode, Editor-in-Chief of the Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Academic Director of the Osgoode Professional LL.M Program in Intellectual Property, and an Associate Professor at Osgoode Hall Law School. I am delighted to be writing my first IPilogue post as incoming Director of IP Osgoode!

IP 81