IIPRD

JANUARY 18, 2024

Introduction If we take a broader look at the Intellectual Property Laws, the primary objective of the legislation in framing these laws is to provide exclusive rights to the IP right holder as against the entire world. Therefore, the two legislations clearly have contrasting objectives.

Intellectual Property Law 52

Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Law Licensing 52

IPilogue

SEPTEMBER 3, 2021

Recently, AI technology once again exceeded the legal community’s expectations by filing a patent for its invention of interlocking food containers. Under patent law, it is the general expectation that inventors are humans, not robots. Europe, Australia, and South Africa, only Australia and South Africa granted this patent.

Inventor 106

Inventor Patent Law Law Patent 106

IPilogue

JUNE 2, 2022

Michelle Mao is an IPilogue Writer and a 2L JD candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School. Reversing what seemed like a victory for supporters of AI-owned intellectual property, the full bench of the Federal Court of Australia has confirmed the majority view of the world: only human inventors can own patent rights to their creations.

Invention 111

Invention Ownership Intellectual Property Inventor 111

The IPKat

NOVEMBER 29, 2021

In 1990, Dr Llewelyn was appointed to a lectureship at the University of Central Lancashire, at Preston, which was followed in 1993 by a move to the University of Sheffield, initially as a ‘Common Law Institute for Intellectual Property (CLIP) Lecturer in Intellectual Property.’

Intellectual Property 80

Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law IP Law 80

Kashishipr

OCTOBER 20, 2021

On the other hand, international trade law recognizes that where a unique problem arises specifically referable only to a particular field of technology, a solution applying sui generis only to that field of technology cannot be said to be discriminatory according to the ordinary meaning and purpose of the TRIPS Agreement.

Patent 105

Patent Intellectual Property Inventor Government 105

The IPKat

OCTOBER 31, 2021

has written about this in an article that was recently published in the UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law. Here's what Mattias writes: Closing the patent loophole across borders by Mattias Rättzén Extra-territorial Kats It is a legal maxim that patents, like any other intellectual property rights, are territorial rights.

Patent 86

Patent Invention Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property 86

LexBlog IP

APRIL 12, 2023

.” But our problem often is that the law, or lawyers, frequently use unfamiliar or exotic terms that others claim have no more understood meaning than a reference to a “ vermicious kind ,” and those or other lawyers may overuse a word that they do not seem to actually comprehend. Eset, LLC, a patent case.

Law 52

Law IP Intellectual Property Copyright 52