article thumbnail

antitrust claim against Suboxone, including false advertising, survives summary judgment

43(B)log

22, 2022) The court here allows an antitrust claim to proceed based in part on allegedly false/misleading statements because they form part of the alleged anticompetitive product-hopping scheme and because the unique characteristics of the drug market make market-based responses to false advertising difficult.

article thumbnail

US News rating was mere opinion except as to school that intentionally submitted bad information to it

43(B)log

23, 2024) Plaintiffs alleged that defendants conspired to inflate the US News ranking of USC Rossier School of Education by submitting inaccurate or incomplete data to US News and market the resulting ranking to the public. News and World Report’s 2010 edition of America’s Best Graduate Schools.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Nickels and Dimes Goes Full Tilt on Noah’s Arcade in Trademark Infringement Suit

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

Nick els and Dimes states that it then began using the Trademark TILT STUDIO in 2010, and the TILTED 10 Trademark in 2021, in association with arcade games and indoor entertainment.

article thumbnail

2023 Internet Law Year-in-Review

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Regulators have sought to suppress online targeted advertising for years, with only minimal success. In turn, advertisers have fled Twitter. Then, in Liapes v. Musk has bridged that gap. unless you are a Nazi or wannabe.

Law 103
article thumbnail

gold buyer's "up to 90%" payment claims were plausibly misleading

43(B)log

The parties compete in the market for buying gold from ordinary people. In 2010, the Today Show—a morning television show aired on the NBC network—aired a segment in which it mailed a single item of gold to ten different mail-in precious metals dealers and compared the prices offered. That’s a question of fact.

article thumbnail

standard setting bodies don't proximately cause Lanham Act injury when states adopt their recommendations

43(B)log

21, 2022) Geomatrix sued defendants for Sherman Act violations and false advertising in the market for onsite wastewater treatment systems, aka septic systems. Other defendants allegedly used their roles in the standard setting process “to disparage and preclude Geomatrix products from the market.”

article thumbnail

Proving genuine use of an EU trademark to defeat revocation proceedings

The IPKat

Background Gufic Pharmaceuticals, a manufacturer of Ayurvedic medicines, registered in 2010 the word mark “Gufic” for goods in Classes 3, 5, and 29. Because under Paragraph 8 of the Drug Advertising Act (HWG), Gufic was not allowed to advertise its products in Germany, it could not demonstrate ‘use’ of the trademark to attract customers.