Managing IP Summit: AT&T IP chief stresses need for global collaboration
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Managing IP Summit: AT&T IP chief stresses need for global collaboration

Scott Frank, AT&T IP CEO

At Managing IP’s Intellectual Property and Innovation Summit, Scott Frank at AT&T talked about the importance of IP and the Global IP Alliance

AT&T’s intellectual property CEO took the stage at Managing IP’s Intellectual Property and Innovation Summit on May 24 to talk about the importance of IP and the need for more global co-operation on patent, trademark and copyright matters.

During his keynote talk, Scott Frank – who is based in Atlanta but flew to New York to attend the event – said IP was a critical component of societal development.

“I don’t know how many people appreciate what we do and how important it is to civilisation, but I believe it’s fundamental to our existence,” he said.

“IP is what drives society forward and is what gives us most of what we need in the physical realm. Getting a COVID vaccine out as fast as possible, for example, isn’t possible without IP.”

He added that there were a few problems with the IP system, however. One of those was the lack of education and general knowledge on the subject across the US and much of the world.

“We all know how important IP is, but I would venture to say that 95% or more of the people in this country and around the world wouldn’t have the foggiest idea of that fact,” he said.

Another problem, he said, was collaboration, pointing out that getting ideas from heads into hands was often expensive, time-consuming and complicated. He noted that the whole process was intimidating and that it needed to be made more accessible.

On that note, Frank said, the IP profession needed to do more to foster diversity and inclusion. He argued that a lot of people with great ideas, particularly minorities, found it hard to see ideas realised and to break into the IP ranks.

“There’s a gigantic opportunity to help those people too,” he said. “And there’s a strong business driver there – because to truly get the best and get the best ideas developed, you need diversity and inclusion.”

Global outreach

Frank then started to talk about the Global Intellectual Property Alliance (GLIPA). He said GLIPA, which emerged as a result of the success of the US Intellectual Property Alliance (USIPA), would officially launch in Atlanta in October.

He added that GLIPA was built on three pillars: driving awareness and education, enabling ecosystem collaboration and facilitating diversity and inclusion. These mandates, he said, should help address some of the key IP system problems across the globe.

Frank said that as with the USIPA, he wanted as many people to join GLIPA as possible, including lawyers, in-house counsel, inventors and academics, to help spread IP knowledge.

“We were looking around at other IP organisations and realised there were a bunch that represented lawyers and corporations, but none that represented citizens. When we looked at it from that angle, it became clear why some of the problems I talked about existed.”

The IP chief said he was currently on a recruitment drive to get as many people as possible involved in the GLIPA committee, the body set up to establish the global organisation.

The committee currently has more than 100 members, including judges, IP heads and partners (and this reporter), across the Americas, Africa, Asia, Europe and Oceania.

The organisation was being put together in partnership with WIPO. Frank noted that Lisa Jorgenson, WIPO’s deputy director general for patents and technology, was a USIPA board member, as were former USPTO directors Dave Kappos and Andrei Iancu.

Frank noted that GLIPA didn’t have a website, but said interested parties could visit the USIPA site for more information.

In-house counsel, private practice lawyers and other professionals gathered on May 24 at Managing IP’s Intellectual Property and Innovation Summit for panels on patents, trademarks, trade secrets and other IP issues.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers weigh in on the USPTO’s request for comment on the effects of AI on prior art analysis and obviousness determinations
A vast majority of corporates – especially smaller businesses – rely on a trusted referral when instructing external counsel, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Munich Regional Court ruled that Lenovo was an unwilling licensee and had engaged in ‘holdout’ tactics
Technological innovation should play a critical role in advancing sustainable practices, argues Justin Delfino, global head of IP and R&D at Evalueserve
Ewan Grist of Bird & Bird, who acted for Lidl in its trademark victory against Tesco, reveals some of the lessons brand owners can take from the judgment
Dolby’s lawsuit at the Delhi High Court follows a record win by Ericsson earlier this year against the same defendant
Tee Tan, chief information officer at the owner of several IP firms, says to avoid tech just for the sake of it and explains how his company builds in-house tools
Regardless of whether the FTC’s ban on non-competes goes into effect, businesses should stop relying on these agreements
Mary Till, a former legal advisor at the USPTO who has joined Finnegan this week, is looking forward to providing clients with a USPTO perspective
Gift this article