5 Key Takeaways - PTAB Update: The Waning Impact of Fintiv on Discretionary Denials

Kilpatrick
Contact

Institution is Discretionary -

35 USC §§ 314, 324 provide that the Director “may not authorize” a PTAB proceeding “unless” the petition shows that there is a “reasonable likelihood” (for IPR) or that it is “more likely than not” (for PGR) that Petitioner will prevail on at least one claim. As such, the decision to institute a PTAB proceeding is discretionary. As the Federal Circuit has indicated, “the PTO is permitted, but never compelled, to institute an IPR proceeding.” Harmonic Inc. v. Avid Tech., Inc., 815 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2016). An institution decision is not appealable.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Kilpatrick | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Kilpatrick
Contact
more
less

Kilpatrick on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide