Remove 2004 Remove Cease and Desist Remove Fair Use Remove Social Media
article thumbnail

Trademark Infringement in the Digital Age

IP and Legal Filings

It gave them the ability to sue in court to stop infringement and recover damages for unapproved use of their marks. Trademark owners frequently used cease and desist letters to pressure infringers to stop using their marks without authorization before taking legal action. Case Study: Satyam Infoway Ltd.

article thumbnail

A 512(f) Plaintiff Wins at Trial! ??–Alper Automotive v. Day to Day Imports

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

In 2004, the Ninth Circuit eviscerated it (in the Rossi case) by requiring plaintiffs to show that senders subjectively believed their takedown notices were abusive. Diebold from 2004, which led to a $125k damages award. As I’ve blogged many, many times on this blog (see list below), 512(f) has been a complete failure.