2004, Due Diligence, Litigation and Ownership

Search:

DAY

WEEK

MONTH

YEAR

Select your country:
Sign up | Log in

2004

Due Diligence

Litigation

Ownership

An Explorative Study on the Liability of Domain Name Registrars with reference to Trademark Infringement.

IP and Legal Filings

FEBRUARY 20, 2023

This entails requiring them to obtain all the pre-requisite information before registering a domain name and ensure that the registrant does not end up in crossfire of a cybersquatting litigation or a suit for trademark infringement. Satyam Infoway Ltd v Siffynet Solutions, 6 SCC 145 (2004). 1125(c)(2)(B) (1996). GoDaddy.com, Inc. ,No.

Trademark

Trademark Registering Trademarks Registration Trademark Law

The Ninth Circuit Reaffirms the Discovery Rule for the Copyright Act’s Statute of Limitations — Starz v. MGM (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JULY 25, 2022

Under the “discovery rule,” the limitations period begins to run when “the plaintiff discovers, or with due diligence should have discovered, the injury that forms the basis for the claim.” It’s copyright infringement because an exclusive license is a transfer of copyright ownership. Petrella , 572 U.S. 17 U.S.C. § 3d at 481.

Blogging

Intellectual Property Pulse

An Explorative Study on the Liability of Domain Name Registrars with reference to Trademark Infringement.

The Ninth Circuit Reaffirms the Discovery Rule for the Copyright Act’s Statute of Limitations — Starz v. MGM (Guest Blog Post)

Stay Connected