2008, Brands, Design Patent and Patent Law - Intellectual Property Pulse

Search:

DAY

WEEK

MONTH

YEAR

Select your country:
Sign up | Log in

2008

Brands

Design Patent

Patent Law

Logos Remain Relevant: Source Confusion and Design Patent Infringement

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 17, 2023

This post will focus on another key issue from the case – the relevance of logos in design patent infringement analysis. Still, ornamental logos found on the accused product can still be relevant as visual distractors in the process of evaluating similarities and differences between the claimed design and accused design.

Design Patent

Design Patent Patent Infringement Designs Design

The Scope of Comparison Prior Art in Design Patent Infringement

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 2, 2022

2022) raises a number of important design patent law questions, including an issue of first-impression of the scope of “comparison prior art” available for the ordinary observer infringement analysis under Egyptian Goddess, Inc. 2008) (en banc) and its key predecessor Smith v. 2008) (en banc).

Design Patent

Design Patent Art Designs Design

Logos Remain Relevant: Source Confusion and Design Patent Infringement

The Scope of Comparison Prior Art in Design Patent Infringement

Stay Connected