2011 Advertising Marketing Trademark Law 
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
AUGUST 30, 2023
This is a competitive keyword advertising lawsuit. The plaintiff has a trademark registration for the “Nursing CE Central” mark for providing continuing education for nurses. This is fine, but it deviates from courts’ efforts over the years to come up with multi-factor variations specific to keyword advertising.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JULY 25, 2021
Aliign “is an event, lifestyle, and apparel company” allegedly with a first trademark use in 2011. If they really wanted to build their business, they could have invested that money into marketing instead of legal fees. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. Ohio Bans Competitive Keyword Advertising by Lawyers.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IP and Legal Filings
FEBRUARY 20, 2022
Slogans are brief, memorable words that are commonly used in advertising to promote a specific company. Companies seek to protect the value of their trademarks since they can be quite valuable to the brand. Using a mark as an advertising slogan, on the other hand, does not prevent it from being registered as a trademark.
SpicyIP
NOVEMBER 8, 2023
Speaking of this topic, I can’t miss Bedaquiline , the first new drug to receive approval to treat tuberculosis (TB) in over 40 years, which raised serious questions about its marketing approval without mandatory Phase III clinical trials in India and around informed consent of Indian patients. Corruption in IP Offices, Anything New?
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
SEPTEMBER 14, 2021
The court starts its trademark analysis nostalgically: “Turn back the clock to the Internet’s nascent age—1999.” Netscape and 2011 Network Automation cases modified it. Marketing channels. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. ” (How about this: let’s not). HEY APP STORES–FIX THIS.
SpicyIP
DECEMBER 12, 2023
But the facts pertaining to its market share indicate that the mark has achieved distinctiveness. The statutory threshold for proving trademark dilution is pegged higher when compared to trademark infringement and passing off. Ltd, against the mark ‘dialmytrip’ and the domain names ‘www.dialmytrip.com’ and ‘www.dmtgroup.in’.
The IP Law Blog
SEPTEMBER 22, 2022
It apparently conducted market research and discovered that P&P was one of the most successful sellers on Amazon in this category. In March 2019, P&P sued Johnson Enterprises for trade dress infringement under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act and unfair competition under California law.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
85 
Let's personalize your content