2015 Fair Use Licensing Plagiarism 
Plagiarism Today
OCTOBER 4, 2022
Implied License – Second, Take-Two could have argued that, by placing the tattoo on Randy Orton, that Alexander granted an implied license for it to be used as part of his image, including on TV, film and video games. In short, the jury only weighed in on the fair use question, which they found the use to not be fair.
Patently-O
DECEMBER 11, 2023
Moreover, as we detail below, the best understanding of the application of fair use principles to AI training would hold that the practice is in most if not all instances a fair use. The FTC has no authority to determine what is and what is not copyright infringement, or what is or is not fair use.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Plagiarism Today
AUGUST 18, 2021
However, a judge tossed the case, ruling that Corellium’s use was a fair use. Clanton, who performs under the name Slugga, claimed that 2 Chainz ripped off his 2015 song of the same name. The 3 Count Logo was created by Justin Goff and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
Copyright Lately
DECEMBER 28, 2022
” But in McGucken , the court denied summary judgment, not only as to the server test, but on Newsweek’s implied license and fair use defenses too. Simply put, the ruling calls into question the ability of tattoo owners to control the right to make or license realistic depictions of their own likenesses.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
211 
Let's personalize your content