2016, Artistic Work, Derivative Work and Marketing

Prince, Prince, Prints: Will the Supreme Court Revisit Fair Use?

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 28, 2022

But unbeknownst to Goldsmith, he also created fifteen additional works (including silkscreen prints and pencil drawings) using the Prince Photograph for his own artistic purposes. That factor asks “whether, if the challenged use becomes widespread, it will adversely affect the potential market for the copyrighted work.” [20]

Fair Use

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing

U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use — Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 20, 2023

Legal Background: Copyright and Derivative Works Copyright law protects original works of authorship, including “pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works,” 17 U.S.C. For obvious reasons, the copyright in a photograph does not include the right to publicly perform the copyrighted work.

Fair Use

Fair Use Derivative Work Blogging Licensing

The clash of artistic rights: Warhol, Goldsmith, and the boundaries of copyright in Brazil and in the U.S.

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AUGUST 7, 2023

In 2016, Condé Nast acquired a license from the Warhol Foundation to use the Prince Series as illustrations for a new magazine. A third reflection emerges: undoubtedly, Warhol’s work was created based on Goldsmith’s. 3] Regardless of the creative level of a work, copyright comes with limitations.

Intellectual Property Pulse

Prince, Prince, Prints: Will the Supreme Court Revisit Fair Use?

U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use — Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)

The clash of artistic rights: Warhol, Goldsmith, and the boundaries of copyright in Brazil and in the U.S.

Stay Connected