2016, Artwork, Derivative Work and Social Media

Search:

DAY

WEEK

MONTH

YEAR

Select your country:
Sign up | Log in

2016

Artwork

Derivative Work

Social Media

Let’s Go Hazy: Making Sense of Fair Use After Warhol

MAY 22, 2023

The court’s limited ruling also means that museums displaying the artwork don’t need to worry that they’ll be served with injunction papers any time soon. Warhol used it to create the other Prince Series works. And AWF used it to license an image of Warhol’s Orange Prince to Condé Nast in 2016.

Fair Use

Fair Use Licensing Copying Artwork

Fair Use: Graham v. Prince and Warhol v. Goldsmith

LexBlog IP

JULY 7, 2023

8] Second, as to the works’ purpose, the court found that it was unclear whether Prince intended to create a parody of the original photographs, a satire of society’s use of social media, or neither, pointing out Prince’s own contradictory testimony on the question. [9] Many derivative works.

Fair Use

Intellectual Property Pulse

Let’s Go Hazy: Making Sense of Fair Use After Warhol

Fair Use: Graham v. Prince and Warhol v. Goldsmith

Stay Connected