Remove Cease and Desist Remove Fair Use Remove Intellectual Property Law Remove Registering Trademarks
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Rules “That Dog Don’t Hunt”: Bad Spaniels Toy’s Use of JACK DANIELS Marks is a Poor Parody and Dilution Act Applies

Intellectual Property Law Blog

On June 8, 2023, the Supreme Court in a unanimous decision held that a trademark claim concerning “a squeaky, chewable dog toy designed to look like a bottle of Jack Daniels whiskey” which, as a play on words, turns the words “Jack Daniels” into “Bad Spaniels” and the descriptive phrase “Old No. 1125(c)(3)(A).

Fair Use 130
article thumbnail

Trademark Infringement in the Digital Age

IP and Legal Filings

For trademark owners, litigation was their main option. It gave them the ability to sue in court to stop infringement and recover damages for unapproved use of their marks. Trademark owners frequently used cease and desist letters to pressure infringers to stop using their marks without authorization before taking legal action.

article thumbnail

Resolving Conflicts Between Trademark and Free Speech Rights After Jack Daniel’s v. VIP Products (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

As I noted on Twitter , nothing in the opinion suggests that the display of parodies, jokes, or other messages on the surface of toys, T-shirts, or other types of expressive merchandise would, by itself, constitute a trademark use of another’s mark or trade dress. Redbubble, Inc. , Youngs Drug Products.

Trademark 100