Remove patent-reexamination
article thumbnail

Written Description as a Subset of Novelty and Nonobviousness

Patently-O

Zahner Design Group v. D746,078 (Patent being litigated). Zahner’s Design Pat. D746,078 covers the ornamental design of a shower curtain as shown in the figures above. Zahner sued Katri Sales for infringement, and the defendant turned-around and filed a request for ex parte reexamination. Images below).

article thumbnail

Proving Printed Publications

Patently-O

Folks continue to file anonymous ex parte reexaminations. Design Patent No. The reexamination examiner agreed with the challenge and issued a final rejection that the claimed design was anticipated by four different prior art references. Ex parte Zhang , Reexam No. 90/014,234, 2021 WL 633718 (PTAB).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Scope of IPR Estoppel Expands, but How Far?

Patently-O

That prevision bars an IPR petitioner involved in patent litigation from asserting any invalidity grounds that the petitioner had “raised or reasonably could have raised during that inter partes review.” Eligibility : The inventive feature here is use of bit repetition to better ensure wireless signal transmission. patent laws.

article thumbnail

How To File Color Drawings Electronically Via EFS-Web

Patentably Defined

Generally, when drawings for utility patent applications are required, they must be black and white line drawings. Color drawings are permitted when they are the only practical medium to disclose a claimed invention and even then an applicant must petition the USPTO to accept them. The Rules for Drawings. Petitions under 37 CFR 1.84(a)(2)