article thumbnail

A 512(f) Plaintiff Wins at Trial! ??–Alper Automotive v. Day to Day Imports

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The Lenz case got a lot of press, but it ended with a confidential settlement. Signal 23 Television v. As a double-insult, 512(f) preempts related state law claims over abusive takedown notices, so it actually leaves victims worse off than if 512(f) didn’t exist by clearing out the field. Anthony, 2020 WL 11206863 (N.D.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (March 20-March 25)

SpicyIP

The Court allowed the application and permitted the plaintiff to place the additional documents on record as despite the documents being available in the public domain at the time of filing of the suit, the need for filing the aforesaid documents arose only on account of the stand taken by the defendants in the written statement.

Designs 105
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (January 1- January 7)

SpicyIP

International IP Developments Nokia and Honor enter into an amicable settlement of their 5G SEP dispute in China. Associated Broadcasting Company Ltd. New roster of Delhi High Court IPD takes effect from January 3. Clothing brand Superdry sues Manchester City for using similar Asahi Super”Dry” logo for their training kits.

article thumbnail

U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use — Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

(If so, I have seen no evidence of that in public record; and the subsequent procedural posture suggests otherwise.) But in any event, AWF’s aggressive, take-no-prisoners approach made a friendly settlement all but impossible. Before 2020, the Supreme Court decided only four fair use cases. In the first, Sony Corp. of America v.