Remove 2004 Remove Intellectual Property Law Remove Registering Trademarks Remove Registration
article thumbnail

Bombay High Court Rules that Copyright Registration of a Label is not Compulsory

Kashishipr

The plaintiff, SSPL, had filed a lawsuit against the defendant NTC in the Bombay High Court, alleging Copyright and Trademark Infringement. SSPL was incorporated in 2004. When SSPL was incorporated in 2004, SK Oil Industries had assigned it the label’s copyright. Plaintiff’s Arguments.

article thumbnail

Gema USA, Inc. Sues Former Employee for Alleged Patent & Trademark Infringement

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

Registration No. Registration Date. September 14, 2004. is not an authorized Gema distributor and upon information and belief, does not sell “new” Gema products but rather sells knocks-offs using the Gema Trademarks without authorization. OPTISELECT. OPTISELECT. May 16, 2017. April 29, 2008. April 9, 2019.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Bolt Technology v. Ujoy Technology: The Reputation and Goodwill Crossover

SpicyIP

student at Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow. She is keenly interested in Intellectual Property Law, Technology Law, and Corporate Law. This lack of differentiation led to a limited discussion on the standalone importance of the reputational aspect associated with trademarks.

article thumbnail

Trademark Infringement in the Digital Age

IP and Legal Filings

Governments also supported the efforts by enforcing customs laws, which gave officers the authority to stop the entry of counterfeit products into domestic markets by stopping them at the border. The registration and management of trademarks was another essential component. ’s trademark and cybersquatting.