Remove 2009 Remove Cease and Desist Remove Copying Remove Marketing
article thumbnail

Should Copyright Preemption Moot Anti-Scraping TOS Terms? (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Platforms that copy online data and use it to create AI have a strong fair use argument under copyright laws. Copyright law forbids duplication, public performance, and so on, unless the person wishing to copy or perform the work gets permission; silence means a ban on copying. A copyright is a right against the world.

article thumbnail

Trademark Infringement 101: What You Need to Know to Protect Your Brand 

Corsearch

Imagine you’ve conjured up the hottest brand on the market – “Crispy Crunch Delights” , complete with a jazzy logo. Even with innocent intentions, these trademark violations can attract legal eagles faster than you can say, “cease and desist.” We explore in this article. What is trademark infringement?

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Overreaching and delay lead to defeat of TM owner's claims

43(B)log

SMRI’s predecessor in interest did business with the relevant defendants from at least 1999-2009; resold products bearing “Sturgis Motor Classic” in its own retail store; and never complained about the use of “Sturgis” or “Sturgis Motor Classic” on rally products. apart from the mark as shown.” It requires inexcusable delay and prejudice.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (May 8- May 13)

SpicyIP

Case: Holyland Marketing Pvt. They further argued that they had issued a cease and desist notice on 6th November, 2020 to which no response was received. The defendants applied for registration of their mark on 13th April 2009. vs Vijay Pal Vineet Kumar And Co.

Trademark 104