2015 Copying Derivative Work Intellectual Property Law 
JIPL Online
APRIL 9, 2021
xxiv] Intellectual property law recognizes a limited monopoly-esque property right for the creator. Keller, Recognizing the Derivative Works Right as a Moral Right: A Case Comparison and Proposal , 63 Case W. 405 (2019); Terrica Carrington, Grumpy Cat or Copy Cat? 8, 2015), [link].
LexBlog IP
OCTOBER 25, 2023
Dorland counterclaimed for copyright infringement, claiming that Larson’s use of Dorland’s letter was a violation of intellectual property law. Larson also sought a declaration that she owns the copyright to The Kindest and that the letter in the short story does not infringe Dorland’s copyright.
LexBlog IP
JULY 21, 2021
That question is “how have various countries’ intellectual property laws addressed efforts to copyright, trademark, or patent holy names, sacred words, or outputs of creation?” ” Welsh (2015) at 134. Compendium, at Section 313.2 ]. ” Id. ” Id. at 138-139. Evolation Yoga , 803 F.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content