Remove 2016 Remove Contracts Remove Copyright Law Remove Derivative Work
article thumbnail

The Battle Over Poker NFTs

Plagiarism Today

In that apology, Butz admitted he was “clearly ignorant about copyright laws and got defensive when it was brought to my attention.” ” The case raises questions of fair use and whether the new paintings were transformative enough to be non-infringing or if they were simply derivative works.

Fair Use 239
article thumbnail

Software Downloads Netflix & Disney+ Videos to Make DRM-Free Copies

TorrentFreak

You agree not to archive, reproduce, distribute, modify, display, perform, publish, license, create derivative works from, offer for sale, or use (except as explicitly authorized in these Terms of Use) content and information contained on or obtained from or through the Netflix service. Copyright Law and DRM.

Copying 116
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use — Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

To fully understand these conflicting views of the majority opinion, it is necessary to understand both the specific facts of the case and the history of the Supreme Court’s case law concerning the fair-use doctrine. For obvious reasons, the copyright in a photograph does not include the right to publicly perform the copyrighted work.

article thumbnail

13 Spooky Copyright Cases, Just in Time for Halloween

Copyright Lately

” They argued that had Twain really written the book, Clemens’ estate would own the copyright and Harper would have the exclusive right under contract to publish it. Conjuring up a Copyright Case. In 2016, author Gerald Brittle alleged that the Warner Bros. And there you have it!

Copyright 144
article thumbnail

A Preliminary Analysis of Trump’s Copyright Lawsuit Over Interview Recordings (Trump v. Simon & Schuster) (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The lawsuit involves sound recordings of 19 interviews that then-President Trump voluntarily gave to Woodward between December 2019 and August 2020, plus one interview from 2016 (when Trump was still a candidate). Complaint ¶ 64] In the alternative, Trump pleads that he owns the copyright only in his responses to Woodward’s questions. .”

Copyright 119
article thumbnail

Is Trump’s Copyright Claim Against Woodward “Trumped Up”?

The IP Law Blog

The audiobook, The Trump Tapes , is comprised of 20 audio interviews, one with Trump during his presidential campaign in 2016 and the remaining 19 from the interviews conducted during his term as president. And based on that, the court found the responses given by Taggart were “not an expression of an idea for the purpose of copyright law.”

article thumbnail

Is Trump’s Copyright Claim Against Woodward “Trumped Up”?

LexBlog IP

The audiobook, The Trump Tapes , is comprised of 20 audio interviews, one with Trump during his presidential campaign in 2016 and the remaining 19 from the interviews conducted during his term as president. And based on that, the court found the responses given by Taggart were “not an expression of an idea for the purpose of copyright law.”