Remove 2022 Remove Artistic Work Remove Copying Remove False Advertising
article thumbnail

California Supreme Court reaffirms strict liability for false advertising in Serova

43(B)log

3d -, 2022 WL 3453395, S260736 (Cal. 18, 2022) Not bound by Article III, the California Supreme Court issued a ruling despite the parties’ settlement. Not all marketing of artistic works is noncommercial speech. The First Amendment has long coexisted with no-fault false advertising laws.

article thumbnail

11th Circuit affirms Viacom's Rogers-based win for MTV Floribama Shore

43(B)log

29, 2022) MGFB runs the Flora-Bama Lounge, Package and Oyster Bar on the Florida-Alabama border. Flora-Bama logo The Flora-Bama has been featured in artistic works by third parties. Deliberate copying was irrelevant. Yet both artists won.” MGFB Properties, Inc. Viacom Inc, No. 21-13458 (11th Cir.

article thumbnail

Free Speech, Chatting About Friends, Kraken/Crackin’ On AI, & Thinking About Fred & Ginger: Generated Content, Amici Curiae, & A Case About Jack Daniels That Dances Around Trademark Issues And Leaves Some Things To Chew On

LexBlog IP

22-148 , both before and after the petition for certiorari was granted on November 21, 2022. ” This appeal presents a conflict between Rogers’ right to protect her celebrated name and the right of others to express themselves freely in their own artistic work. VIP Products LLC , Docket No. Rogers , 875 F.2d