article thumbnail

Seeking Clarity on Comparison Prior Art: Seirus Petitions Supreme Court in Heat Wave Design Patent Dispute

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch Seirus has petitioned for writ of certiorari in its long-running design patent dispute with Columbia Sportswear. Questions presented: When looking for comparison prior art, is the article’s function relevant in any way? Must the comparison prior art be the “same article” as claimed?

article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Narrows “Comparison Prior Art” for Design Patent Infringement

JD Supra Law

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals recently narrowed the scope of “comparison prior art” that may be used in a design patent infringement analysis. Comparison prior art” includes references used to help highlight distinctions between a plaintiff’s claimed design and a defendant’s design that is accused of infringing.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Design Patent: Invalid as Unduly Functional

Patently-O

Evo’s design patent claims an “ ornamental design for a foldable bag ” as shown in the figures above. district court held the patent invalid as both functional and obvious; and also not infringed. Functionality : Design patents focus on ornamentality rather than utility. by Dennis Crouch.

article thumbnail

2023 Design Patents Year in Review: Analysis & Trends

JD Supra Law

Not surprisingly, 2023 was another notable year for design rights around the globe. did we see court decisions that will, in the case of one, and could in the case of another, have significant impact on design patent jurisprudence. However, nowhere more than the U.S. In particular, the U.S.

article thumbnail

Patent Poetry: Federal Circuit Rules on “Comparison Prior Art” in Design Patent Infringement

JD Supra Law

The Federal Circuit has ruled that “comparison prior art” used in infringement analysis in a design patent infringement must be applied to the same “article of manufacture” that is identified in the claim of the design patent. By: AEON Law

article thumbnail

Chilly Adventures: Design Patent Prior Art Comparison Applies to Article of Manufacture

JD Supra Law

Addressing a matter of first impression concerning the scope of prior art relevant to a design patent infringement analysis, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded that “to qualify as comparison prior art, the prior-art design must be applied to the article of manufacture identified in the claim.”

article thumbnail

Obviousness Test for Design Patents Unchanged

The IP Law Blog

Design patents and utility patents are two different things. Design patents protect ornamental designs, such as the shape of a perfume bottle or the design on flatware. To be patentable, however, both designs and functional inventions must satisfy two requirements. Telflex, Inc.,