Artistic Work Artwork Derivative Work Licensing 
Copyright Lately
JANUARY 23, 2023
“A photorealistic dining table made out of old license plates” (Midjourney) The tool can then apply its knowledge of tables to the knowledge it has acquired about aesthetic choices, styles and perspectives, all en route to creating a new image that’s never existed before. You’d be wrong. 17 U.S.C. §
IIPRD
APRIL 8, 2024
This article delves into the ongoing debate around the issue of right of ownership of copyright by AI generators for their novel artwork. And then further questions like if given protection under IPR, will that be fair to the initial creators, whose works were used without consent or licensing to create these so-called novel art pieces?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently-O
OCTOBER 11, 2022
Warhol’s Estate argues that the artworks represent a commentary on the dehumanizing nature of celebrity whereas the Goldsmith photos merely reflect Prince in his unique human form. Rather, Warhol worked from a set of studio photographs by famed celebrity photographer Lynn Goldsmith. Warhol was never personally a party to the license).
Intepat
MAY 17, 2024
This is because the resulting work is a new creation that depends on various factors, including the system’s programming and the input prompt. The generated work might be an original creation of the AI, or it could be considered a derivative work depending on the nature of the output and the input data used.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
AUGUST 7, 2023
In 1984, Condé Nast, the publisher, obtained a license from Goldsmith to allow Andy Warhol to use her Prince portrait as the foundation for a single serigraphy to be featured in Vanity Fair magazine. In 2016, Condé Nast acquired a license from the Warhol Foundation to use the Prince Series as illustrations for a new magazine.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
108 
Let's personalize your content