Remove Artistic Work Remove Blogging Remove Marketing Remove Public Domain
article thumbnail

Canada Extends Copyright Term to Life of Author Plus 70 Years, Leaving Many Concerned

IPilogue

On June 23 rd , 2022, the Parliament of Canada passed legislation to extend the term of copyright protection in literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works from life of author plus 50 years to 70 years. additional editions on average after it enters the public domain. The concerns are loud and clear.

article thumbnail

How A Century-Old Insight of Photography Can Inform Legal Questions of AI-Generated Artwork (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

A new breed of artists is using generative artificial intelligence tools like DALLĀ·E, Midjourney, Firefly, and ChatGPT to create artistic works. Do these creations belong to the artists or the public domain? Do creators who use generative AI maintain copyright in their creations? By guest blogger Prof.

Artwork 95
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

When Doors Close, A Market Grows: Museums, COVID-19, and Cultural Digitisation

IPilogue

For North American museums with works still under copyright, the 2017 publication Guidelines for the Use of Copyrighted Materials and Works of Art by Art Museums by the Association of Art Museum Directors will come in handy. However, many of the masterpieces housed by museums are in the public domain.

Marketing 111
article thumbnail

Cardinals Of Intellectual Property Rights (Part- II)

IP and Legal Filings

The blog is divided into two parts and this is part 2 of the blog. PART 1: of the blog discussed about history, development, fundamentals of IPR and explained Patents and Trademarks. This blog will consider different IPs, which are at growing stage. Broad classification of ā€˜worksā€™ which are protected by copyright are-.

article thumbnail

Prince, Prince, Prints: Will the Supreme Court Revisit Fair Use?

LexBlog IP

1] That decision shook the art world, as it seems to dramatically narrow the scope of the fair use doctrine, and raises doubts about the lawfulness of many existing works. [2] That factor asks ā€œwhether, if the challenged use becomes widespread, it will adversely affect the potential market for the copyrighted work.ā€ [20]

article thumbnail

U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use ā€” Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Addressing Factor 4, it asserted there was little or no market harm, because ā€œtime-shifting merely enables a viewer to see ā€¦ a work which he had been invited to witness in its entirety free of charge.ā€ ( Id. This is the familiar four-factor test for fair use. at 450) (Skipping commercials was not yet feasible, id.

article thumbnail

Resolving Conflicts Between Trademark and Free Speech Rights After Jack Danielā€™s v. VIP Products (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

As noted by Professor Jake Linford , the examples used by the Court when it discusses application of the Rogers test focus on uses in the title or content of artistic works (not on T-shirts). VIP Products (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.