Rogers v Grimaldi doesn't apply to alcohol, but Peaky Blinders still can't get injunction
43(B)log
SEPTEMBER 1, 2021
If we got rid of the bizarre idea that Rogers was about artistic works and correctly labeled it as being about commercial speech, courts would do much better. The dictionary definitions of the words “Peaky” and “Blinders” were not dispositive. False advertising/passing off: Same basic problems.
93 
Let's personalize your content