Kluwer Copyright Blog

APRIL 22, 2024

Technically, from a copyright perspective, the NFTs were derivative works of the Paintings (underlying works), since the former included major copyrightable elements of the (previously created) latter. This first duel has ended in a victory for the NFTs, at least for now.

Copyright 121

Copyright Artwork Moral Rights Non-Fungible Tokens 121

IP Tech Blog

JANUARY 4, 2023

In turn, this attracts interest from businesses ranging from fashion and sports brands, sport teams, designers, game developers, and other content owners. The exclusivity of exploitation is key to the success of a limited-edition collectible. Is this the same in the US and China? If yes, under what circumstances? The United States.

IP 109

IP Ownership Non-Fungible Tokens Copyright Law 109

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 4, 2023

In turn, this attracts interest from businesses ranging from fashion and sports brands, sport teams, designers, game developers, and other content owners. The exclusivity of exploitation is key to the success of a limited-edition collectible. Is this the same in the US and China? If yes, under what circumstances? The United States.

IP 52

IP Ownership Non-Fungible Tokens Copyright Law 52

LexBlog IP

APRIL 13, 2022

According to Miramax, the creation of the NFTs constituted copyright infringement because they were unauthorized derivative works of Pulp Fiction. [23] On February 9, 2022, Rothschild file a motion to dismiss the Complaint, arguing that he had “every right to make and sell art that depict branded products.”

Non-Fungible Tokens 52

Non-Fungible Tokens Social Media Contracts Branding 52