LexBlog IP

MARCH 10, 2023

By: Michelle Emeterio and David Barker USPTO Director Kathi Vidal recently petitioned the Supreme Court to review a Federal Circuit decision in In re Elster. There, the Federal Circuit held the USPTO unconstitutionally applied Lanham Act Section 2(c) (15 U.S.C. §

Registration 52

Registration Trademark Law Trademark Government 52

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 30, 2022

By: Zach Schroeder and David Barker. Further, Poterbin argues that Luka99 has failed to produce any authority allowing Doncic to unilaterally withdraw his consent after issuance of the “Luka Doncic 7” mark. 15 U.S.C. § § 1052(c).

Trademark 40

Trademark Registration Privacy Contracts 40

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 15, 2022

Parker and David G. The panel explained that the Lanham Act does not authorize nationwide personal jurisdiction, so the existence of personal jurisdiction in the case depended upon Missouri’s long-arm statute and the federal Due Process Clause. By: Emily R.

Trademark 52

Trademark Advertising Advertising Business 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 12, 2023

A challenge to an NDA on the grounds that was facially overbroad was rejected as premature by Judge Pamela Barker of the U.S. For more on this development, check out David Clark’s post for Epstein Becker’s Trade Secrets & Employee Mobility Blog. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. In AB Pratt & Co.

Confidentiality 40

Confidentiality Ownership Blogging Litigation 40