Remove companies delaware-state-bar-association
article thumbnail

Bald-Faced Attempt to Manipulate Venue Rejected

Patently-O

The underlying actions were filed by a patent holding company known as Ikorongo Texas LLC against Samsung and LG Electronics. As explained below, the owners of Ikorongo Texas formed the company as an attempt to solidify venue in W.D.Texas and avoid the case being transferred for inconvenient forum. The Supreme Court said No.

article thumbnail

Should Copyright Preemption Moot Anti-Scraping TOS Terms? (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Section 301(a) of the Copyright Act provides that “no person is entitled to any such right or equivalent right in any such work under the common law or statutes of any State.” With that, any state or common law claim that is equivalent to copyright must therefore be preempted. Computer Associates International, Inc.,

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Biosimilars 2020 Year in Review

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

At the same time, market uptake of biosimilars in the United States continued to increase, suggesting that there is room for expansion of biosimilars in the U.S. For the first time since FDA licensed the first biosimilar, Sandoz’s Zarxio ® (filgrastim-sndz), in 2015, the United States saw a decrease in annual biosimilar approvals in 2020.

article thumbnail

NPE Showcase: NPE Litigation in 2023 – What to Expect

LexBlog IP

The vast majority of patent infringement cases are filed by nonpracticing entities, or “NPEs” These companies acquire patents with the sole intention of monetizing the patents through litigation rather than selling products or services incorporating the patented technology. “Everyone infringes” is an NPE’s dream.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (December 18- December 24)

SpicyIP

The Respondent/ Opponent was a well-known Chennai based company using its registered BSA mark for selling bicycles and related goods. The Plaintiff issued a cease and desist letter against the use of such marks and the Defendant agreed to settle the claim, but not to discontinue use of its erstwhile company name. . & Anr.