Remove companies edible-arrangements-llc
article thumbnail

Edible Drops Claims In TM Suit Against Cannabis Co.

IP Law 360

Edible Arrangements LLC and its parent company have dropped a trademark suit against the makers of "Incredibles" cannabis products, while the defendants have agreed to drop their counterclaims in the suit.

article thumbnail

Not a Trademark Case: Edible vs Google at the Georgia Supreme Court

Patently-O

Edible IP v. The following comes from Edible’s brief: Edible’s claim is simple. It owns valuable intangible property associated with the trade name “Edible Arrangements.” Briefs: Edible Appellant Brief. Edible Appellee Brief. Edible Reply Brief. Edible Amicus. = = =. Constitution.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Sale of Keyword Advertising Not a Basis for Georgia State Tort, Quasi-Contract, and Civil RICO Claims

JD Supra Law

In Edible IP, LLC v. Google, LLC, 313 Ga. 2022), Edible IP, a company that sells edible floral shaped arrangements made out of fruit, sued Google, an internet search company, for using Edible’s EDIBLE ARRANGEMENTS trade name as part of its auctioned keyword advertising.

article thumbnail

Georgia Supreme Court Blesses Google’s Keyword Ad Sales–Edible IP v. Google

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Edible Arrangements objected to Google selling its trademark to trigger keyword ads. The Edible team had the brilliant idea of suing Google for “theft of personal property” and “conversion,” where the stolen/converted asset was the trademark. Case Citation : Edible IP, LLC v. They could not.

IP 126
article thumbnail

Court Dismisses Trademark Claims Over Internal Search Results–Las Vegas Skydiving v. Groupon

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The record may likewise show that consumers sometimes mistakenly seek to redeem vouchers for other skydiving companies with LVSA… as a matter of law, a reasonably prudent consumer in this marketplace is unlikely to be confused as to the origin of the service offered. Case citation : Las Vegas Skydiving Adventures LLC v.

article thumbnail

Google’s Search Disambiguation Doesn’t Create Initial Interest Confusion–Aliign v. lululemon

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Aliign “is an event, lifestyle, and apparel company” allegedly with a first trademark use in 2011. lululemon is the well-known yoga gear company. Case citation : Aliign Activation Wear, LLC v. FTC. * Selling Keyword Ads Isn’t Theft or Conversion–Edible IP v. lululemon athletica Canada Inc. June 7, 2021).

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (January 1- January 7)

SpicyIP

Jyotpreet Kaur writes on March-in Rights, the changes proposed in the US NIST guidelines, and India’s position on similar arrangements. The Court observed that the plaintiff was a renowned company manufacturing cables and wires for CCTV cameras, and also produces security cameras through its brand ‘Crabtree’.