Remove companies hotels-com
article thumbnail

The Grand Budapest Hotel – Booking.com

IPilogue

signals broader protections for trademarks vis-à-vis giving online companies latitude to trademark “generic” titles and disagreeing with the federal government’s restrictions. In 2011 and 2012, Booking.com applied to register “Booking.com” as a trademark associated with hotel reservation services with the U.S. Booking.com B.V.

article thumbnail

THE CONSUMER IS ALWAYS RIGHT: BOOKING-DOT-WHAT, BOOKING-DOT-TRADEMARKED

JIPL Online

Booking.com sought a trademark for “Booking.com” but the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) denied its trademark because it found “Booking.com,” “a generic name for online hotel-reservation services.” [iv] com” is no different than a company adding “inc.” BOOKING.COM refers to some specific entity.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Confirmed Booking: Booking.com secures trade mark registration in the United States

IP Whiteboard

The United States Patent and Trademark Office ( USPTO ), who had rejected the trade mark application for booking.com , argued that booking.com is a generic name for online hotel-reservation services and that, as a rule, combining a generic term like “booking” with “.com” com” yields a generic result. com” is generic.

article thumbnail

Two More Cases Compel Arbitration for Dubious Online Contracts (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

20 years ago, you didn’t enter a contract when you had someone watch your dog or buy groceries or use a hotel room or when you got a cab. 2, supra ), § 6, com. Stated another way, we should not delegate questions of unconscionability to an arbitrator because a company that allegedly did the unconscionable things said so.