Patently-O

NOVEMBER 2, 2021

(proper but inconvenient forum); 22-101 In re: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. proper but inconvenient forum); 22-103 In re: Arista Networks, Inc. proper but inconvenient forum); 22-106 In re: Juniper Networks, Inc. 22-110 In re: Netflix, Inc. 22-110 In re: Netflix, Inc.

Litigation 142

Litigation Business Technology Patent 142

IP Law 360

DECEMBER 7, 2022

The Federal Circuit examined a lower court's decision to order Finjan Inc. million in legal fees to Juniper Networks Inc. in a patent dispute, questioning during Wednesday's oral arguments if the cybersecurity company should be forced to cover litigation costs for both damages and infringement.

Patent 40

Patent Litigation 40

IP Law 360

MAY 18, 2022

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board on Wednesday probed the extent to which WSOU Investments LLC needs to submit evidence to rebut arguments from accused infringer Juniper Networks Inc. that the patent licensing company's routing patent is invalid.

Patent 40

Patent Licensing 40

IP Law 360

OCTOBER 27, 2021

Finjan Inc. million tab for legal fees a lower court said the company owed to Juniper Networks Inc. wants the Federal Circuit to undo the $5.9 in a patent dispute, saying the award doesn't meet the applicable standard for such fees.

Patent 40

Patent 40

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 24, 2021

In re: Juniper Networks (Panel: Judges Dyk, Prost, Hughes). That streak has come to an end, as today the court issued In re: Juniper Networks. That streak has come to an end, as today the court issued In re: Juniper Networks. at 7, quoting In re Genentech, Inc. , By Jason Rantanen. ” Slip Op.

Litigation 57

Litigation Patent Infringement Government Patent 57